[apk919]

Originally Posted by smoseley

I don't really think I need to spell all this out again for you, do I? Fine, I will, just because you seem to have trouble getting history straight:

• Someone said something about Obama's whacko.
  
  
• glb said he's more afraid of McCain's whacko.
  
  
• You said "who? the guy who baptized his children?"
  
  
• I said, no, more likely glb is referring to Parsley, the whack-job who wants to rid the world of Muslims.
  
  
• You came back with some off-kilter argument about how all religious people believe in little green men and then associated glb's pro-Obama stance to me, claiming again that Obama's guy (or was it Obama?) is a racist, bigot, anti-American egomaniac.
  
  
• I retorted that glb's referenced "McCain's guy" (after all, I still haven't made a claim either way) is yet worse, and if following glb's logic with regards to McCain (as you would have us follow yours with regards to Obama), would have a genocidal maniac in office.
  
  
• You said I made a claim about someone. I never did such a thing.

No, I've got my history is straight.

It's the relevance and content of your argument that isn't straight.

I'd go through a bullet point by bullet point refutation of your argument, but frankly, I'm bored by it. Maybe I'll get to it later. Maybe not.