Quote:
Originally Posted by ezmoney
Others have told you that GW Bush is not running for reelection. John Kerry is not running for president . . . he did his running to leave Viet Nam as fast as he could. Clarke's book should be on the fiction list, but since not many copies sold maybe in the trash instead.
Deal with what we have not with what could have been! glb you're not in Kansas anymore!
|
I repeat:
1. McCain supported 95% of bush policies, which makes those policies & his support of them relevant. Would you claim otherwise?
2. Kerry war efforts (and heroism) are well-documented by men who were there. He got wounded twice. Certainly he didn't get out asap. You actually believed the now-discredited "swift boat" bs? Read all the interviews with the men with whom he fought...who have no axe to grind and who have been saying the same thing for decades...not just around elections.
Kerry, war hero vs. bush, deserter (for whom I guessing you voted). If I'm wrong about your vote, I apologize.
Did you know that the secretary for the general who had bush during Vietnam stated that what Dan Rather said was true, about Bush's absences and what the general said about him? I'd guess...um...no.
You are naive here.
3. Nothing in Clarke's book has been termed false. He uses direct quotes and there are others who were there and verified what he wrote.
It seems to me that you refuse to look at any facts that don't fit with your set beliefs.
It is this knee-jerking, cursory glancing, lack of analytical thinking that got us where we are now (hint: Not a Good Place).
Kansas? I have facts on my side, you have emotion and propaganda. So, which of us, then, is more realistic?
Republicans have not been good for our country, in peace and in war. Or, economically, as history shows.
Only after LBJ did the right thing, but lost the racist-inflicted South in the process, did Republicans gain power.
and, among Republicans, THIS administration (AND it's supporters and apologists,
incl McCain) is the absolute worst.