Quote:
Originally Posted by glb
1. You've not done any research on this.
2. "Cut and run"? You really don't mean to use this worn-out phrase, as I assume that's what your quote marks indicate. Remember which admin said "you have to watch what you say (after 9/11) and equated not agreeing with their policies with being anti-American and pro-terrorist. Ridiculous and untrue.
|
I said "cut and run" because that's what they want to do. I didn't say they were being anti-American and pro-terrorist, you brought that up. I just think that they are dead wrong.
Quote:
Originally Posted by glb
cute, but he's shredding your arguments, sorta eating your lunch.
|
The sophomoric nonsense he said did nothing to my argument. I was asking a genuine question not setting a trap. If someone wants to use the argument that the war is costing too much they should have some idea what the new plan will cost.
Quote:
Originally Posted by glb
Gee, how original. If you think I'm wrong, just give me the facts to back up your opinion. Not a single thing I've said is incorrect, has been refuted.
|
Read my previous posts. I give lot's of facts.
Quote:
Originally Posted by glb
Your remarks aren't moving things forward. I don't advise taking the personal-attack approach...you won't win there either.
|
Did you see the little face sticking out its tongue? I was just fooling with you. You take this stuff way too seriously. Your're sitting
safely at your computer. Thank a soldier. They're being shot at while you type your reply so that you can sit there
free to answer this post.