View Single Post
Old 08-06-2008, 10:04 AM   #18 (permalink)
charliex
disproving HD MTBF daily
 
charliex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Las Vegas , NV
Posts: 8,597
the dashdaq alone is too slow to read AFR's properly, OBD II isn't designed to supply data that quickly, but thats irrelevant anyway since the AFR's can't be read by the OBD II anyway, you can monitor LT/ST fuel trims which will tell you if theres something amiss.

you're better off with something that adds a wideband at precat then logs that, the dashdaq can log from the zeitronix and the innovates and a few others, that'll allow it to data log faster.

If you only want AFR's just get a stand alone gauge like the AEM, they have 0-5V outs and some have rs232 outs too, since they're still in the 1970s.
__________________
Black Exige S - http://goth.am 265 Mule / Elan M100 ECU Tuning, http://www.elisetalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=39660
Arguing with an engineer is like wrestling with a pig in mud. After a while, you realise the pig is enjoying it.
charliex is online now   Reply With Quote