Thread: Tesla Drama
View Single Post
Old 06-15-2009, 07:37 PM   #67 (permalink)
ChrisB
I'm Lovin' It!
 
ChrisB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Newport Beach, CA
Posts: 3,968
Images: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by IamBatman View Post
lets step back a minute, are you talking about adoption growth or efficiency growth? I see solar as a small part of the solution. so I don't think 100% adoption is realistic, maybe 25-50% is a good goal. As far as efficiency, I know an old guy in the Sunset district of SF that was one of the early adopters of photovoltaic power. He pays like $30 a year for electricity with his 10yr old array, in an area of SF known for fog and overcast weather. Its not even that big of an array. Do I think its realistic to have solar cells that powers cars without batteries? Absolutely not, but inexpensive solar panels that charges plug-in hybrids are a realistic goal.
I think the confusion here is that you stepped into an interchange between Mikeyd and I, so your original response to my post was out of context:

Quote:
Originally Posted by mikeyd View Post
The amount of Solar energy being generated/collected is doubling every 2 years and is just 8 doublings away from fully meeting current needs (i.e. potentially 16 years)
Your first point above, is the point I was expressing to Mikeyd. I don't see the solar generation of power doubling every 2 years until we reach 100% of the electrical needs of the country.
__________________
'05 AR Mods: Stebel Nautilus horn; tesprit's rearview mirror; Custom Interior Pictures; PPF full front clam wrap
ChrisB is offline   Reply With Quote