View Single Post
Old 06-21-2009, 08:27 PM   #38 (permalink)
Gizmo3000
Register Abuser
 
Gizmo3000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Sherman Oaks
Posts: 970
Quote:
Originally Posted by mjf View Post
I don't understand why Tesla wants to distance itself from the Lotus brand. They certainly designed a derivative product, using many lotus parts, even if they're not the same parts as the Elise. It's not like the Lotus brand has a negative image.
While Tesla obviously wouldn't have been able to produce such a car if it wasn't for Lotus, ya can't really blame them either for trying to downplay the Lotus involvement.
Nobody likes to admit that they needed help

I think they're just on the defensive when people try to refer to their cars as Electrified Lotus's, so they're then forced to explain the differences.

I think the only bump anyone gets for mentioning Lotus would be if they were involved in the handling of the car. "Lotus suspension" might help.
"Built by Lotus" or "Lotus Build Quality" doesn't quite do the trick.

only thing worse than that would be "Lucas Electronics" hah.. if Lucas was still around and made electric car parts, people would probably be dying from electrocution!@#
__________________
2005 Starlight Black Elise, -hardtop/touring/black interior/sector111 carpet buttons!
2008 Infiniti G37-S
1991 300ZX 2+2
1974 MGB Roadster
Gizmo3000 is offline   Reply With Quote