View Single Post
Old 06-30-2009, 06:46 PM   #50 (permalink)
RoadDad
perfututum futūtor
 
RoadDad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 6,030
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tpup View Post
Wow, you actually believe that the purpose of requiring new cars to meet minimum safety and emissions standards is to make money for politicians and insurance execs as opposed to cleaning up the environment and making safer cars? Wow...
Cleaning up the environment? Which do you think is more polluting -- an S1 Elise, a 340R or that '72 Cuda?

Safety standards? Which is safer -- an S1 Elise, a 340R or that '72 Cuda? My Model T didn't even have lap belts.

Go learn and report back here why we have a "federally mandated" 2.5mph bumper requirement and tell me that has anything to do with safety.

If they really wanted to clean up the environment and make cars safer they would have to, again, mandate out all of the antiques (which they don't care about) and/or require that they all be retrofitted with 3 point belts, etc. Oh, but they don't.
__________________
"Really, you want to maintain a semblance of professionalism since you represent Lotus.
Me... I don't need to.
Bite me." -Randy
RoadDad is offline   Reply With Quote