Well, I really do hate whe posts degenerate into 2 (or in this case, 3) person conversations. So, I'll just add a little bit more before I get the chance to post some other data.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by PhlypSide
No problem, and thanks for the free life coaching, I had no idea that I should defer to someone with more "experience" truly a novel concept, sort of like a FWD sportscar  LOL! I haven't driven an M100 and although it's probably a fine automobile, sadly (for you?) it still won't change my opinion that it's not a sportscar. |
Well, that says a lot right there. Seems it is a truly novel concept for you because people posting here who have driven the car, unlike you, and have the experience with it, unlike you, are telling you you're wrong.
Frankly, I don't care if you chnage your mind, We are all entitled to our opinions. Opinions are never right or wrong - they are simply opinions. I think its a shame that you haven't driven one for yourself and insist that it can't be a sportscar when you've never been behind the wheel are likely even read an article about the car.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by PhlypSide
The very point of the discussion here is whether or not FWD cars are sportscars, not whether or not M100s are the exception to that observation/understanding/view.
|
Huh???
I thought we were discussing whether a FWD car can be a sportscar. Others brought up the M100 as a great example. You're saying it isn't - because its FWD. I and others say it is. YOU decided there was a rule that said FWD cars can't be sportscars. I don't see anyone else in the world saying that. Sure, they are saying its the preferred layout. Therefore, we are arguing there is an exeption that your rule - the M100. Did anyone credible say it simply can be done with FWD????
I don't think so.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by PhlypSide
3 words for you: Relax M100 Fanboi. |
Not a chance Anti-FWD buoy
