LotusTalk - The Lotus Cars Community - View Single Post

rsharma · 08-12-2007, 06:28 PM

Here's a question for history buffs...

We all know George Washington served two terms as the first president. Most people also know that he served as the General of the Continental Army during the war for independence for about 7-8 years.

Do you think he was a better president or a better General? Obviously, it's an easy argument that if he were to be a bad General, he probably wouldn't be the first president. But that argument is too simplistic and probably naive. What do you think?

08-12-2007, 06:28 PM	#1 (permalink)
rsharma Registered User Join Date: Mar 2006 Posts: 49	George Washington Here's a question for history buffs... We all know George Washington served two terms as the first president. Most people also know that he served as the General of the Continental Army during the war for independence for about 7-8 years. Do you think he was a better president or a better General? Obviously, it's an easy argument that if he were to be a bad General, he probably wouldn't be the first president. But that argument is too simplistic and probably naive. What do you think?