[Flash G]

Originally Posted by TimMullen

Basically, if nothing else, it's guilt by association. Hillary supports organizations - and those organizations support Hillary - that have publicly declared that they intend to ban all guns. Hillary's record speaks for itself - she has voted for every anti-gun bill that has occurred during her time in office (and Bill's too), and those are as far reaching as banning ammunition to allowing law suits to force the gun manufacturers out of business to redefining what constitutes certain types of guns (i.e. target rifles should be banned because they are "sniper rifles"). The list goes on...

Here's the result of a quick google search. Unfortunately, some of the working is a bit off the wall, but the facts remain. Things like this are seldom reported by the main stream media as they tend to also be overwhelmingly anti-gun. Here's some of the links:

http://archives.cnn.com/2000/ALLPOLI...uns/index.html

http://www.gunowners.org/pres08/clinton.htm

http://acuf.org/issues/issue65/060809pol.asp

http://thelibertysphere.blogspot.com...un-agenda.html

http://www.nrapublications.org/first...om/Hillary.asp

I just read all 5 pieces (the last four of which are opinion pieces, not news pieces) and nowhere did it say anything about her wanting to "ban personally owned guns".)

I don't think voting for a bill that would allow lawsuits against gun manufacturers and supporting gun registration amount to anything close to " banning personally owned guns".

This is why I say all of the hatred is based on hysteria and not fact. Saying that she wants to ban all guns is just plainly not true.



.