![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#61 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 1
|
I received a speeding ticket for going 61/63 on PCH right before the tunnel to the I-10 (This is after making a left turn coming down from the California incline). I realize the speed limit posted there is 45, but usually by the time I go home at night around 8pm everyone is going at least 60, and naturally start increasing speed to get on the I-10 towards 65. I got clocked during the daytime (when I dont usually go this route as I am usually working) going this speed as the cop was standing by the side of the road going eastbound. He said I could contest the ticket do whatever I want as long as I respond by the date on the ticket. He proceeded to say the only reason he was ticketing me was because I was going an unsafe speed where there was a pedestrian who was killed a month ago. I checked the web and found news about a woman who was in a car accident that died from being hit on the road, but that was because she was outside of her car when she got in an accident. Otherwise there are never any pedestrians on that road. I feel as though this was a speed trap incident, as everyone that drives down PCH around that area is going at least 65. any advice on fighting off this ticket? Do I get a speed survey from Caltrans or from Santa Monica DPW? Thanks!~
|
|
|
|
|
|
#62 (permalink) |
|
Engineer of Record
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: SandyEggo
Posts: 197
|
when you fight it in court keep in mind a few tings....
(I am NOT providing legal advice, only information) if they paced you, they have to have produce a certified calibration of the car speedo done within 6 months, if they dont have it then you walk because their speed measureing device has not been proven within a legal degree of certainty as accurate..as LONG AS YOU know to ASK FOR IT. Same with radar, they need to have a certification that the tuning forks used to test the radar calibration have themselves been tested within 6 months, if they dont have it at trial you walk because their evidence is now suspect. Courts have taken judicial notice that radar works as a valid speed measurement devide provided that: The operator is trained in its use The unit's calibration was checked before and after the arrest AND the device that checks the units calibration is ITSELF calibrated, (as the tuning forks are measurement devices themselves), within a reasonable period of time. (which courts have taken as 3 to 6 months) This is based on mucho established case laws. If you ask for this documentation and they dont have it you walk. Remember you are not charged with going fast, you are charged with a specific speed, and if the speed measuring device they used cannot be proven accurate to a legal degree of certanity they have no evidence. This is called asking for Foundation and if the cop does not have the docs at trial you will win. It is impt not to ask for it until crossing the cop. Then the prosecution has rested and they are screwed if they dont have the docs. If the prosecutor asks for more time to get the docs, object Your Honor, the trial is now, today, and the defense is present and prepared. It is not the fault of the defense the people do not have proper foundation and they need to move on without it. then Move to dismiss for lack of evidence If the judge says that the calibration is not important say: your honor I have provided you with numerous case laws that show the documentation requested by the defense is required (give the judge the revelent case laws at the start of your trial) He cannot ignore precident, if he does he will lose if you appeal If the judge says you should have asked for the docs in discovery prior to trial say: your Honor, it is not the responsibility of the defense to provide foundation for the prosecutors evidence, the people know or should know what foundational material they need to bring to trial to verify their speed measurement is accurate to a legal degree of certainty based on case law. Motion to dismiss for lack of evidence a few more things if you are cited for 22349(a) the maximum speed law, you can still use the speed trap defense (meaning they have to produce a traffic survey not more than 5 years old at the trial to verify the 85 percentile speed) as long as the road you were cited on has a posted limit lower than 65. In cali, the case is people vs studley. The state cannot use ANY radar speed measurement if it was obtained in a "speed trap" even if they did not write you for 22350. This is a good one. Cops write you for 22349a thinking they get out of having to produce the traffic survey at trial, but it works only if they wrote you on a road with a 65 limit (i.e the freeway) if they bring the traffic survey then this does not work, but they probably wont have it, its another defense to throw in if there is no prosecutor you also can severly limit what the judge can do at trial, because he cannot act as the prosecutor. He cannot object to your motions because he is not the peoples lawyer, he cannot enter any written matter into evidence, he cannot make motions, etc. He is very limited as long as you know to ask at the trial start" I notice there is no prosecutor to plead the peoples case, will YOU be acting as the prosecutor for the people? He will be forced to say NO, and when he does, you can jamb him if he does anything that is reserved for a prosecutor to do. SO if the cop does not show, he cannot move to postpone the trial to another date, as there is no one representing the people to make the motion If he says you should have asked for the radar calibration data in discovery, you can say there is no prosecutor to object to your request for foundation If the cop happens to bring the radar backup data to court, there is no one to enter it into evidence, the judge CANNOT do it, and the cop cannot do it, as he is not licensed by the bar to practice law. If the judge does it he will get overturned, because he is performing the job of the prosecutor and denying the defendant the right to a unbiased trier of facts (the judge) The cheapness of the court screws them IF you know the things the judge cannot do. He cannot even have the APPEARANCE of being biased. Say, The people are knowingly proceding with no prosecutor to plead their case, this shall in no way impair the defendants right to a fair trial and an unbiased trier of facts and the limitations presented as such are burden they have chosen to accept. Every time the judge tries to do a prosecutor thing, you object and ask him"Are you now acting as prosecutor, your honor". He knows you are in the right and may dismiss you because he is tired of your noise and does not want all the other sheep behind you to hear how easy it is to beat the system.
__________________
02 Phoenix Yellow M3 (fast and fun) 06 Autumn Gold Elise (faster and funner) 07 328iT (wifey's car) |
|
|
|
|
|
#63 (permalink) |
|
Drunk on alcohol
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 3,130
|
How to fight parking ticket in CA: How to fight parking ticket in Los Angeles
__________________
'06 Evo IX Stage 1E Tuned by Road Race Engineering(Stock:turbo,intake,internals,ECU) Walbro 255lph fuel pump,RC Engineering1000cc Injectors, AVO exhaust,RRE dyno tune flash, Dejon Tool boost controller (325whp @ 22PSI Costco 91 octane, 353whp @ 25psi on 100 octane, 383whp @30psi on E85) , Zeitronix wideband,Zeitronix Ethanol Content Analyzer, Defi BF gauges, Stoptech rotors, SS brakelines,Graphic/Interior Design,Brand Identities,Invitations www.nomadic-nomads.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#64 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 49
|
Looking for advice/guidance/help. anyone have any idea how to get a engineering traffic safety report for I-10 , 10 miles outside of Blythe, Ca ? And I am looking for the CVC code that gives me the right to have my arrangement and trial on the same day? Any help would be greatly appreciated..
Thank you Nate |
|
|
|
|
|
#65 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 49
|
Okay after doing lots of research I have a question if someone can please help me. I was ticketed in Riverside County, I have family that lives in San Bernardino county. I did not ask the offer for county Seat, How can I request this if I lose Written declaration. Is it to late??
|
|
|
|
|
|
#66 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 1
|
Samples of Arguments- Failure to Do Complete Stop- Burbank- CA
Hi Charles,
Thanks for your posting. It is very helpful. I have a MD driver's license & during my visit to CA on my second day, while I was taking the car out of my friends apartment complex, I was stopped for an infraction (Failure to do a complete Stop) and handed a ticket of $201. The options I have are: 1. Trial by Declaration Payment - The amount due is $201.00. 2. Traffic School Payment - The amount due is $265.00 plus a e-Public Access service fee* of $10.00 will be added to this amount or 3.Full Payment - The amount due is $201 plus a e-Public Access service fee* of $10.00 will be added to this amount. I do not completely understand the difference between 2 & 3. Can you help? As suggested in your posting, I am planning to do a "Trial by Declaration" using mail without appearance in court. You said you have sample arguments that can be used for this. It would be very helpful if you could share that with me for my infraction of "Failure to a a Complete Stop". 3. Now, I have the choice of taking a traffic school by paying additional amount but get away with points and thus the increased insurance. In case I do a Trial by Declaration, will I still have the traffic school option open or pleading guilty by the judge will put me at a risk with that? Please help. Thanks a lot in advance. Warm regards, AJ Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#67 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1
|
Hello i got a ticket for u-turn violation and want to do the not guilty by mail thing, what kind of inf do i need to put when sending in the not guilty plea and do i also need to put in the deposit for traffic school if i looe at this point
|
|
|
|
|
|
#68 (permalink) | |
|
Form and Function
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Alta Loma, CA
Posts: 3,046
|
Quote:
Sign up on the website ticketassassin.com .... well worth it, and it will tell you exactly how to fight it this way. I have won twice this way.
__________________
www.FaceNBody.com 2005 Lotus Elise: 2bular decat\GT3 exhaust,HID's,turn signal&rear fins delete, CFside scoops, CFbinnacle,CFcenter console,Zoom CF mirror,APR Aero kit,CF 5-elem. diffuser,Exige mesh,Ohlins DA,RTD brace,RAC 'lites,Toyo R888's,HawkHT10's,CO painted calipers,SS lines,Reverie XC CF seat,Reverie CF steering wheel,Schroth Profi II 6 pt harness,shifter re-Enforcer,Manly mounts, Accusump,Moroso pan,BWR key to BWR S/C! Spec Racer Ford #237 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#69 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Santa Cruz County
Posts: 5
|
They're Great
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#70 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2007
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 149
|
Are there more people who used Ticketbust.com who could give me their point of view? I am considering using their service and wanted to get some additional feedback.
Thanks
__________________
06 Elise, GG, Touring, Sport, Hardtop, Starshield |
|
|
|
|
|
#71 (permalink) |
|
Form and Function
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Alta Loma, CA
Posts: 3,046
|
Anyone have any advice on how to fight a speeding ticket caught by laser?
I'll be in court tomorrow....hope cop doesn't show up...
__________________
www.FaceNBody.com 2005 Lotus Elise: 2bular decat\GT3 exhaust,HID's,turn signal&rear fins delete, CFside scoops, CFbinnacle,CFcenter console,Zoom CF mirror,APR Aero kit,CF 5-elem. diffuser,Exige mesh,Ohlins DA,RTD brace,RAC 'lites,Toyo R888's,HawkHT10's,CO painted calipers,SS lines,Reverie XC CF seat,Reverie CF steering wheel,Schroth Profi II 6 pt harness,shifter re-Enforcer,Manly mounts, Accusump,Moroso pan,BWR key to BWR S/C! Spec Racer Ford #237 |
|
|
|
|
|
#72 (permalink) | |
|
Rollin' On Gold!
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,387
|
Quote:
Usually you try to fight the possible discrepancies of the laser. Was the officer properly trained and when was his last training? Was the officer properly trained to interpret false signals? For radar to work good: * The road must be flat and straight. * There has to be good visibility. * There needs to be minimum traffic. * The officer needs to know that. Ask if he was using the great feature called autolock? If so, mention that The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration suggest that you disable the auto lock on units that have this function and the newer units no longer have this capability. Was he hiding around or under an overpass? Bouncing error can occur when there is an overpass in the vicinity of the chase and the radar beam is reflected off of multiple targets at the same time. The vehicle in question, an overpass, a sign, etc. will result in an improper reading. Ask him if he was tracking your car with his gun, and how? If he states any arm movement, when the officer swings the unit up to point at the targeted vehicle, the speed of his arm is added to the speed of the vehicle and throws off the reading generated by the vehicle.
__________________
__________________ 2006 Lotus Elise AW |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#73 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 3
|
Hey guys I need your help..
I have requested "Trial By Declaration" and had a few questions on what can i say to increase my chances of winning. I already got my papers in. So my story is, i was going downhill through this hairpin turn, there was a cop in the end. He was parked and i was not able to see him until the end of the turn. He does a u-turn and pulls me over. He tells me he pulled me over for speeding. I told him that i did not believe i was. Here's the info that is written on my ticket. for the violation it says: 22350 cvc-speeding Speed Approx. (47)mph P.F./Max Spd (30)mph So i have received my TR-205 Form and dont know exactly what i can (should) write to increase my chances of winning. Any tips would be appreciated =) Its due on Nov 2nd, today is Oct. 26th so I need to mail it out by Wednesday. Please help in any way you Guys can. Thanks. Ps. Pv sheriffs blow Peter Shin |
|
|
|
|
|
#74 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 49
|
I am currently in the process of filing my appeal on a speeding ticket, I have been getting assistance from Help! I Got a Ticket! This is the best site for advise.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#75 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 3
|
Quote:
just say that i was not speeding? im sure there is more to that.... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#76 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 49
|
After reviwing what you were cited for. 22350
22350. No person shall drive a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibility, the traffic on, and the surface and width of, the highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property. This is a great one to fight over! Read it! did you do what that code says? Most people dont!! On your written delecration you write-- I stand by my Plea of NOT Guilty! Only way you win a Written declaration is if the officer does not submit his! There is a 75% chance of winning on this one! If not you Request a Trial De Nova and put the office on the stand and ask him about the weather, traffic and if you were endangering the lives of other, and when he says no then you should win! |
|
|
|
|
|
#77 (permalink) |
|
Every Car is a Project
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 816
|
Hey cpforyou, tried PMing you a while back but no reply, now your mailbox is full. I'd like to get some example arguments for my particular citation, thanks.
__________________
2005 Lotus Elise (Jet Blue Metallic) - ForcedFed 340 2002 Ford Focus SVT (Pitch Black) - Powered by 4.6L of V8 goodness
|
|
|
|