![]() |
|
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#22 (permalink) | |
|
Register Abuser
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Sherman Oaks
Posts: 763
|
Quote:
You have to appreciate a Lotus for what it is, not for all the creature comfort that it's lacking. I'm surprised you forgot to mention how the car you drove didn't have a cup-holder! The Elise isn't a souped up 4-door sedan, nor is it meant to be a luxury sports car. It was essentially designed from the ground up to be a street legal track-car, with performance first and foremost. They aren't designed to be commuter cars with all the amenities of a car built around the drivers and passengers comforts. So if you're going to complain about things like ingress/egress, it's clearly not the car for you. (I'm the same height with more weight, and have no issues getting in whatsoever) <object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/THgeRlhVs0Y&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/THgeRlhVs0Y&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object> As for the prices, they're actually quite consistent and what you'd expect them to be at compared to similar high performance sports cars. they all drop a chunk of change the moment you drive them off the lot.
__________________
2005 Starlight Black Elise, -hardtop/touring/black interior/sector111 carpet buttons! 1991 300ZX 2+2 1974 MGB Roadster |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 11
|
refocusing the discussion just a tad... UltimateLurker was saying if he had to nit pick that those are things he didn't like.
Coming from a 2004 STi with many, many mods to the car I can understand a few of Lurkers nit picking cons. My STi is faster than my Elise, in terms of handling and in terms of power. The exhaust note on the STi is a very attractive exhaust note and has a very unique rumble to it. I also use to be into high revving Honda motors (K20 Type R with individual throttle bodies anyone?) so, I enjoy both a NA and Forced Inducted car. I can understand where Lurker is coming from, he's trying to compare the Elise to his STi, and unfortunately it's hard to compare two cars that are in two totally different leagues. If anyone has ever watched Best Motoring I guess I can better explain it like this: One is a high revving light weight, mid engine, rear wheel drive, very balanced, well poised stripped out down hill touge monster. The other is a catering to a few creature comforts, power steering, DCCD, all wheel drive, flat four boxer motor, turbo, four doors, up hill rally dominator. One of the drivers Keiichi Tsuchiya (famous JGTC Driver) prefers light weight, high revving, well balanced rear wheel drive cars. The other driver Orido seems to gravitate to heavier, balanced rear wheel drive, all wheel drive, turbo cars. There's a lot of people that can be placed in either one or the other of these categories. I'm personally in both, I enjoy light weight high revving cars, but in the flipside I also enjoy big turbo AWD cars. The Elise and the STi have nearly nothing in common, and yet I yearned for another car like that. I love the exhaust note on the Elise, I love the uniqueness out of the car, and I also love my STi for it's uniqueness albeit a lot of people think it's ugly, but to quote Jeremy Clarkson "You, outside... NOW." cleverly describes the rawness and brawler likeness of the STi. Now that I have put everyone to sleep, I have to say that the Elise is a fantastic car and I love it to death, and I've only owned the car for a couple of days now and I love the balance between power and the handling. I like the interior, but I didn't buy the car for the interior or the lack of space. I sought after a hardtop only, because I preferred the look of the hardtop versus the soft top. I'm 6'2" and 225lbs and I can get in and out of the car just fine, matter of fact I daily drive this car and do not regret it one bit. /soapbox |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 (permalink) |
|
2005 Ardent Red, Touring
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Beverly Hills
Posts: 2,147
|
I bought my 2005 elise brand new, no miles in July 2006 with full warranty for $39k the retail at the time was 42k - the 30k Elise you are seeing are most likely used 2005/6s. 55K is the retail for the Elise SC , you can get a new Elise non SC for 46K retail price - less after some negotiating. Also they raised the retail price in 2007 mainly due to the weak dollar vs the strong UK pound - 2 to 1 ratio. They over produced cars in 2005 bringing in 2000 units to a very small horribly supported US dealer network with no advertising. They cut that number to something like 700 units a year then this year even less. That 30k pricing will likely actually trend up eventually .....
__________________
"You can run over an insect and know just from the messages coming through the wheel how many legs it had. Was it a beetle? Was it a spider? Hang on......... spider." Jeremy Clarkson - Top Gear Last edited by delise : 09-30-2008 at 02:33 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 (permalink) | ||||||
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Cape Girardeau, Mo
Posts: 115
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
.Quote:
.
__________________
"Stuff sold by the gram is always going to be more exciting than stuff sold by the pound." |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#26 (permalink) | |||
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Cape Girardeau, Mo
Posts: 115
|
Quote:
is right, what a Redneck thing to do, next you'll suggest an FD with an LS1-swap!Quote:
Quote:
PhantomSTi: Well said!
__________________
"Stuff sold by the gram is always going to be more exciting than stuff sold by the pound." |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#27 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 33
|
Everything you said up to this point was reasonable, but paying $48K for a car you've never driven is about the most foolish thing you can do with your money (IMO), as vehicles are expenses, not investments, and a mistake could be quite costly. I guess you're just that rich
.[/quote]Actually, I am far more "car crazy" than rich, and I am sure someone would make a fortune if they came up with the equivalent of AA for Car Junkie's. Fortunately, the Elise provided me with the "fix" I needed at the time. vincesf |
|
|
|
|
|
#29 (permalink) | ||
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Akron, OH
Posts: 727
|
Quote:
Quote:
paging Onefastlotus... Since there arent many ads here yet... |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#30 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Cape Girardeau, Mo
Posts: 115
|
Quote:
.Haha, maybe. I wish this thread had gone another way, I was really almost converted by that drive, and just thought I'd be honest about the things I had issues with, but it appears that sometimes, honesty isn't the best policy.
__________________
"Stuff sold by the gram is always going to be more exciting than stuff sold by the pound." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#31 (permalink) |
|
British by extrapolation
|
I'm fairly certain this thread is going exactly how you want it to. We are not going to convince you that you need to own a Lotus, because the input and responses you give make you seem like the person who should not own one. Most of us will tell you to move along...and it seems that's what you want to hear.
__________________
07 Magnetic Blue Exige S |
|
|
|
|
|
#32 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Cape Girardeau, Mo
Posts: 115
|
Quote:
My responses don't make me "the person who should not own one", just the person "less likely to own one as a DD over what he already has". There is no question in my mind that keeping the STi is the right thing to do, the numbers don't lie, but there's just something about the Elise that won't let me go, something that doesn't care about numbers, or "right" things to do. I dunno', maybe I'm imagining it. At any rate, I didn't mean to give another negative review, or tick anyone off, I really had a much better experience with this 2nd drive, but I don't think it was enough to convince me to make it my dd. Thanks for all the responses, good and bad .
__________________
"Stuff sold by the gram is always going to be more exciting than stuff sold by the pound." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 (permalink) |
|
Highway Star
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 495
|
UL, I'd recommend that you keep your STi but look forward to getting a used Elise as a 2nd car(or n-th car as the case may be).
From your past visits and posts here, I'm convinced you like the Elise enough but perhaps not enough as the 'only' performance car in your garage. That is understandable. The 2005/2006 Elise's are going to be as pure a Lotus as you are going to get for that price. All following models are going to be more expensive and probably include luxury bits and pieces that most of us don't care for. What I'm trying to say is this - get the Elise for what it is today and live to enjoy it for the same reason. |
|
|
|
|
|
#34 (permalink) | |
|
Enthusiast
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Above the clouds
Posts: 68
|
You know how I know you're a 'Vette driver?
From another STi owner: Quote:
-I like the little steering wheel, though it could use at least tilt. -I think the interior is kind of nice, actually - very stark, very businesslike. I hate the fake aluminum of the STi's interior and wish it were real, like most of the Elise's. -Eh, my STi rattles like nobody's business. The Elise is more solid. Of course, the STi has seven times the milage... -The car is made for driving with the top off! -It sucks indeed, but that's the price you pay for sitting so low to the ground, I suppose. -It's an inline four... whaddya want? ![]() -The price is high because it's worth it. Look at how many more idiots are appearing on NASIOC now that WRXs are pushing $10k. Keep the price high to minimize the number of idiots buying the Elise! I'm very glad that I bought my Elise, but I am also glad that I didn't get rid of the STi, too. It's great having both in my garage, and I'd be torn to get rid of either of them.
__________________
2004 Subaru Impreza WRX STi 2005 Lotus Elise 2006 Pontiac GTO Last edited by Mr. Know : 09-30-2008 at 06:40 PM. Reason: quoted deleted post |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Cape Girardeau, Mo
Posts: 115
|
6-speed: Thanks for your input
.Fox: The only Corvette I'd ever own would be a 1967 Conv., make mine a 4-speed 327 .
__________________
"Stuff sold by the gram is always going to be more exciting than stuff sold by the pound." |
|
|
|
|
|
#36 (permalink) | ||
|
anglophile in exile
|
Great photos! Really like the one of Charlie Brown (and naturally the best one has your daughter in it
)Quote:
Quote:
![]() As you have said - only you can decide if it is suitable as a daily driver for you - all the best in making your decision ![]() |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#38 (permalink) | |
|
Lotus n00b
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 156
|
Quote:
- Do you like the steering feel? I personally really like the steering wheel. - It is a minimalist interior, minimalism=light weight - It is hand-built... and british ![]() - Don't like the soft-top, take it off... the top is supposed to be in the trunk, it's there in case it starts raining. If you want a top get a hard-top, looks better imo. (I hear AG Hardtops are hard to come by) - I didn't have a problem with ingress and egress. Well it was a bit intimidating the first time, but it really isn't a big deal if you know the proper technique. - I like the way it sounds. (High RPMs do sound better than idle though). I do like 4-cylinders though. -2008 Subaru Impreza WRX STi - $34,995 2008 Lotus Elise - $46,270 not really that much more to pay for a hand-built, rare car that isn't developed by a large car manufacturer. Then again I don't really know anything, I don't own one... I do read a lot of car magazines (on the toilet) though, and the Lotus is praised for it's steering feel and fun factor over pretty much every other car. |
|
|
|
|