![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 803
|
Just finished testing new Intake manifold with great results
Houston Garage engineering FTMFW - Not bad for a couple of guys with a bigass belt sander
![]() For those of you who don't know I have been working with Littlerocket on developing a bolt-on intake manifold for the 2ZZ for almost a year now. We started on the flowbench and we finally finished a prototype and got it to the dyno today. Here are the results of today's dyno testing. To make a long story short we made 23 HP peak and over 35 at the old lift transition. There is no power dip on with the manifold so its kind of hard to tell but the new lifttransition is at 4600 RPM. This is the same car, same day same dyno - we never even unstrapped it off the dyno since the intake is very easy to swap from above. JesseIL was in town for work and came by and he was present the whole time as an independent observer and he also helped out with the Power FC tuning (thanks Jesse!) The car used is Littlerockets GTS. Its a stock junkyard motor he put in when he hydrolocked the other motor a few months ago. It has about 75K on it and it uses a bit of oil. (went through between 1/2 and 3/4 quarts on the dyno today). It has a stock header that I ported, a straight pipe with no cat and a Magnaflow muffler. The engine itself is bone stock and actually seems pretty weak so the overall numbers for before and after would probably have been considerably higher on a healthy one, let alone one with head work and cams and a racing header. The before numbers are a stock intake and TB. The after numbers are out prototype intake and Q45 throttle body. We expect to be able to further improve the numbers with the production intake by probably 4 or 5 HP. (The prototype has the runners attached to the plenum with soft rubber couplers which we couldn't keep from sagging that resulted in misalignment - we had to do this to allow us to change teh runner length for testing. This is the STREET intake manifold - it clears the Celica hood with no problem. One component will be relocated and the appropriate bracket will be included in the kit. We were unable to determine the full capabilities of the new intake manifold because, while we did have 440cc injectors on the car, we maxed out the stock fuel pump at about 190 HP so we never bothered to shorten the runner length to see what power we could make with a higher torque peak. Without further ado here is the dyno - I will post more information about the days activities further down in the post. Our manifold Versus stock with a Power FC - same tune, same dyno, same day: ![]() Our Manifold Versus stock with a Power FC - both fully tuned for that setup, same dyno same day ![]() The intake is made form heavy gauge aluminum and features a CNC head flange, CNC intake bells, Computerized mandrel bent runners, CNC plenum end, CNC IAC mount & throttle cable mount, etc. Last edited by Boosted2.0; 04-27-2009 at 11:09 AM. |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 803
|
Oh - DD performance stands for Dave and David (thats me and littlerocket)
We spent about an hour and a half trying to get the best possible numebrs on the stock setup before we switched to the new intake. Here are the before and after results for that tuning: ![]() And here are more zoomed in Graphs that show the difference in torque and HP between the tuned stock intake and our tuned prototype intake: ![]() ![]() We spent over 2 1/2 hours tuning the new intake with (obviously) good results. There is definitely still room for improment though and we will make another trip to the dyno as soon as possible with a new fuel pump and see what kind of damage we can do if we move the torque peak from 6800 up to 8000. We anticipate over 200 HP. Based on the HP to CFM gains ratio for the intake we did some ricer math, and with stage 3 piper cams, this intake and TB and a P&P head and a race exhaust like the PPE we anticipate that over 240 WHP should be possible. With increases in comrpession ratio and the introduction of race gas we estimate that 270 WHP may be possible. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
The Mad Scientist
|
David, just read all of it over at NewCelica - awesome work!
Do you think it would help us supercharged guys at all? BTW, PM me your email when you get a chance. WooHoo! -David
__________________
d.a..v...i....d David Thomas Stewart - davidtstewart@gmail.com 2005 Graphite Grey Lotus Elise + BOE Rev400 DragTimes: 402hp 1762lbs. 11.477 @ 123.59 mph |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
OSX Black hat
![]() Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Las Vegas , NV
Posts: 10,000
|
nice going dave.
__________________
Black Exige S / Elan M100. Don't run a smaller pulley without an upgraded fuel pump! http://www.goth.am ecu stuff.. New reflash box coming soon! |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Moderator Extraordinaire!
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Sharpsburg, GA
Posts: 2,806
|
I just read over your post on newcelica and I have to say you have done a great job. Not being the biggest fan of FI, this is a great way to boost the power from an NA engine for a reasonable amount of money.
I have a couple of questions though: With an '05 Elise, will this manifold be compatible with the stock Lotus ECU or are we going to need a retune? Will the manifold be compatible with the stock TB or do we have to switch to Nissan TB you were using on the Celica? Will a lot of intake parts have to be relocated if we can still use our stock TB and airbox? If we have to switch to the Nissan TB, are we able to use the stock air box and intake hose or will these parts need to be relocated, resized, or simply exchanged for a CAI? Will this manifold along with any other modifications pass a simple smog test (simple ECU download) or will there be code/CEL problems? TIA for your answers to these questions and again, this is a great breakthrough for us NA guys. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Unattractive Nuisance
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chester, NJ
Posts: 6,220
|
tesprit asked my questions..
subscribed
__________________
05 elise (PES chip, SSRs, shift tower mods, Multivex; HID low beams); 05 Corolla XRS; 72 Elan Sprint, 170 hp (Sold) "Political language is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable." G. Orwell. "Incontinence Emergency Hotline- Can you please hold?" |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 803
|
Quote:
If you use the Q45 TB you will want to use a 3" CAI to take full advantage of the flow. Better to suck through a bigger hose when you can. If you use the stock TB then the airbox / air hose will need to be moved to fit properly. Some parts will need to be relocated - we need to check on a few things before we know for sure which ones. We WILL be making one to fit the Lotus even if it means a slight re-design or more parts relocated. This should pass smog fine as long as you use the stock TB. Correct, unless you work out a remote mounting for the roots charger, like on the back of the engine below the header or something. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
Moderator Extraordinaire!
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Sharpsburg, GA
Posts: 2,806
|
Thanks for the info!
Assuming the stock TB is used with the adapter plate, how much and in which direction will the original airbox have to be moved? There isn't a lot of room to move the airbox around in that area. The main reason I would want to retain the stock airbox is that for some reason people seem to have a lot of CEL/code problems when using CAIs on the Lotus. Again, this looks great and I am looking forward to seeing how the fitment on a Lotus goes. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 803
|
Quote:
I think we might see if Charlie is interested in making a tune for a 3" CAI, 440cc injectors and a race header with this intake and the Q45 TB |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
Formula Ford User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: San Diego!
Posts: 6,054
|
+100 !! yes yes - package that all up together with hardware, tune, and dyno data.
...that would be a true n/a solution! and i think there would be a good # of interested parties. the hardware is the real trial and error hard part, and the tune is the magic to make it work. the dyno data demonstrates what the real value is.
__________________
"I really started paying attention to cars was when they came out with the Nissan Z, the first body. Then I seen the Cherokees, the old square ones, and I was like, “Wow, that’s cool.” Then I seen the Isuzu jeeps and I seen the Wranglers." -Lotus Cars VP of Global Design |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
OSX Black hat
![]() Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Las Vegas , NV
Posts: 10,000
|
i'm up for it, might be in houston over at sgp racing sometime
__________________
Black Exige S / Elan M100. Don't run a smaller pulley without an upgraded fuel pump! http://www.goth.am ecu stuff.. New reflash box coming soon! |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 (permalink) |
|
Formula Ford User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: San Diego!
Posts: 6,054
|
if you want a socal car... i am in san diego - w/ ff street header.
__________________
"I really started paying attention to cars was when they came out with the Nissan Z, the first body. Then I seen the Cherokees, the old square ones, and I was like, “Wow, that’s cool.” Then I seen the Isuzu jeeps and I seen the Wranglers." -Lotus Cars VP of Global Design |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 (permalink) |
|
OSX Black hat
![]() Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Las Vegas , NV
Posts: 10,000
|
heh, am i shocked?
I have the forcedfed, but i'd say the 2bular/tubular one is the one i see the most.
__________________
Black Exige S / Elan M100. Don't run a smaller pulley without an upgraded fuel pump! http://www.goth.am ecu stuff.. New reflash box coming soon! |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|