![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
|
Exige wing too small?
No more wing envy for me. I've made a hybrid S1/S2 wing
Before: http://bookatrack.com/-PG?brendan&3024&25084&640&.jpg After: http://bookatrack.com/-PG?brendan&3024&25085&640&.jpg I also cut the endplates off the S1 wing and then bolted them back on so it looks almost like a standard S2 item. This also gives me the option of changing the design in the future. More pics: http://bookatrack.com/-pg?3024&25088 |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
-
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 6,927
|
The S1 Exige body shape exhibits some rear lift at speed, hence the need for more rear spoiler in that instance. The S2 Exige (present style) has a rear body shape that inherently produced less lift in the first place. Nick Adams said that the first car went to the style people first while the present car had input from the aero people before the styling folks had finished. I hear that the Exige has various subtle aero tweaks not readily apparent at a glace as they had more time to tune little details.
You could try running the rear wing at a lower angle to cut excess drag. Or you could add more front splitter to add more downforce up front to rebalance the car. Else you'll tend to have more understeer than Lotus intended the car to have at higher speeds. This is in the safe or stable direction at least. Last edited by Stan : 04-24-2006 at 08:49 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
|
I've set the wing at roughly 20% lower angle. In theory, a wider wing should produce the same downforce for less drag. This is what I was aiming for.
Mainly though I just wanted something visually more in proportion to the car. I had an S1 previously, and I liked the size. As a bonus I can say it's all original Lotus parts, and it looks pretty standard so it shouldn't worry my insurance company too much. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
I have 4-Wheel OCD
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Seattle Area
Posts: 371
|
Brendan, I really like the look of that larger wing. Good job. Forgive the stupid question, but is that the S1 wing? Does it just bolt onto the S2 wing supports?
As for rebalancing, you can also have the front of the car lowered to increase the rake. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | |
|
-
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 6,927
|
Quote:
Last edited by Stan : 04-24-2006 at 09:13 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,078
|
how do you set the angle on these wings? are they adjustable somehow?
__________________
KG Exige Delivered 5-9-2006 POLL:check for scratches "in" your headlights Excessive tire wear? It may be your alignment My Example Hiro's Example codymac's Example to be installed: stebel horn, fumoto valve current mods: arqray twin muffler, itg intake, 3M film full wrap and full rockers by X-Perts, rear lotus letters removed, locking gas cap, CF Mirror Covers, CF Side Scoops, black lotus nose/wheel badges future mods:wheels, forced induction |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
|
Thanks for the compliments, guys
![]() Stan, sorry I'm not sure what you mean about awkward angles. Mike, the curvature is almost identical to the original. The stiffness is fine. It seems just as good as the S2 wing. bluejay, the wings are not adjustable. To set the angle I had to carefully shape the curvature of the top edge of the wing supports. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
|
Ah! I see. IMHO it looks much better from any angle. I always thought the original looks too small, and from low down it seems to droop too much at the ends. No such problem with mine because the lower angle of attack means it looks a little straighter.
Looks are very subjective of course, but for me this: http://bookatrack.com/-PG?brendan&3024&25087&640&.jpg is perhaps the oddest angle as the curvature of the wing looks quite pronounced compared with the original: http://bookatrack.com/-PG?brendan&3024&25094&640&.jpg I'm really happy with it. It was almost worth all the hard work. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 (permalink) |
|
I <3 chicken, I <3 liver
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Land of da 1000 Oaks, CA
Posts: 15,053
|
Nice mod. Looks really clean. I like the small wing, though. From above it flows with the car's lines nicely.
__________________
** save ~10 lbs gain 1 hp ** EQ: Y=(190*X) / (1984-X) where Y is (HP) and X is (lbs) '07 EXIGE S ** MY CAR ** VIDEOS! ![]() '08 ACURA TSX 6-speed http://www.makeNYNYagain.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,078
|
are there any adjustable wings for our cars? would there even be a market for them?
__________________
KG Exige Delivered 5-9-2006 POLL:check for scratches "in" your headlights Excessive tire wear? It may be your alignment My Example Hiro's Example codymac's Example to be installed: stebel horn, fumoto valve current mods: arqray twin muffler, itg intake, 3M film full wrap and full rockers by X-Perts, rear lotus letters removed, locking gas cap, CF Mirror Covers, CF Side Scoops, black lotus nose/wheel badges future mods:wheels, forced induction |
|
|
|