![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Can Front-wheel Drive cars be sportscars? | |||
| Yes |
|
156 | 44.83% |
| No |
|
71 | 20.40% |
| H#ll no! |
|
121 | 34.77% |
| Voters: 348. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#321 (permalink) |
|
Registered Abuser
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 215
|
You know, this is a really good forum. Lots of neat things in it, its well designed, great user features and I ESPECIALLY love all the personal info one can view in another profile. Things like age (transio, you young whippersnapper you!), pics and...........people's favorite webpages.
Uhmm..........Phlyp, was this a site you started or one you just like to frequent. http://notfwd.com/main/index.php It is listed as your "home page".............. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#322 (permalink) |
|
Banish me, I deserve it
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Bristol, England
Posts: 87
|
Phil,
I hope you don't mind calling you Phil because Phylip is so formal. Your original reply to dapinky was a rather grand "Welcome to the home of Lotus" which you subsequently changed to "Welcome, cool someone from the home of Lotus" after it was pointed out to you that the US was not the only country in the world, or indeed in the centre of it. Judging by the nature and tone of your other posts, I must ask: Do you often suffer from dilusions from grandeur? Oh, and I'd also be interested to hear your views on football. No idea what it means but I've never seen a skipping sheep before, even in Wales. |
|
|
|
|
|
#324 (permalink) | ||
|
Registered User
|
Quote:
I think the answer lies in here somewhere: Quote:
Well, I vote 1 and 3 for sure !! Definitely not 2 as he don't got no Elise ![]() |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#325 (permalink) | |
|
Banish me, I deserve it
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Bristol, England
Posts: 87
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#326 (permalink) | |
|
Banish me, I deserve it
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Bristol, England
Posts: 87
|
Quote:
The M100 has, amongst other things, innovative and patented front suspension to overcome many of the shortcomings of front wheel drive and is probbably like no other front wheel drive car. Phil, maybe its time for you to sell your Chelsea/Chicago tractor and buy a Lotus! Tell me, if you did, would it be the first Lotus you had owned/driven? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#327 (permalink) | |
|
Banish me, I deserve it
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Bristol, England
Posts: 87
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#328 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Fort Bragg, NC (TX is my home)
Posts: 79
|
So that's pretty comical that you don't consider a sportscar anything that is FWD, but you can take the drivetrain out of a Celica, put it in the rear and change other components to make one.
__________________
00 MR2 Spyder Port and Polished 2zzge w/ 9k RPM Redline, OBX Short Throw, Team Moon Exhaust, custom front polyurethane bushings/endlinks, HID bi-xenon headlights, HID auxilary Sylvania X1010 low beams, SSR Competitions, Metal Transmission Bushings, Pelican Racing CAI, Custom Setrab Oil Cooler, Hawker Odyssey Battery (12 lb) |
|
|
|
|
|
#329 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 44
|
Quote:
So I suppose then to you it's a sports car, despite it's boulevard ride tuning and lack of all-out performance. So clearly you really feel that if you can check some boxes, it's a sports car, and the actual car and experience are totally irrelevant. It's quite a corner you've painted yourself into. Edit: You'd also have to concede that the Plymouth Prowler is a sports car, as it satisfies your checkboxes. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#330 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 44
|
After 17 pages, I don't know what I hope to accomplish by tossing this out, but ehh...
For those who think FWD can't be a sports car because you feel it's not the optimal layout for performance, how do you feel about other sub-optimal (performance-wise) design decisions? Can a convertible be a sports car? You could make the same argument that all else being equal, a fixed-roof car will have a handling edge over a convertible due to chassis stiffness and probably weight. It will also have a speed advantage due to the drag coefficient. Of course you can do things to mitigate the compromise, but that's true of FWD, and pretty much any other choices you make. |
|
|
|
|
|
#331 (permalink) | ||||
|
Registered Abuser
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 215
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Oh the Humanity! Come on Phlyp, admit it. Any drivetrain platform can be a sportscar. Even FWD. Go on, its ok. It'll feel better when its all over. Like a weight from your shoulders. You want to do it. You know you do ![]() Of course, you might have to take down your website slagging FWD cars. http://notfwd.com/main/index.php |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
#332 (permalink) | |
|
Banish me, I deserve it
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Bristol, England
Posts: 87
|
Quote:
Again, with true inventiveness, Lotus combined the roadster concept and innovative engineering to give an unheard of degree of chassis stiffness in the M100. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#333 (permalink) | |
|
Banish me, I deserve it
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Bristol, England
Posts: 87
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#334 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 44
|
Quote:
As it happens, generally they are RWD, generally they are 2-seaters, generally there are a lot of similar characteristics sports cars share. But they aren't etched in stone. You can have a performance focus and still use a different set of compromises than the norm. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#335 (permalink) | |
|
Registered Abuser
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 215
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#336 (permalink) |
|
on my way to Martyrdom ?
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: England
Posts: 37
|
Hi Phil,
I feel that now we're all mates (buddies?) I can call you that, although I see from your profile that your name is actually Jack (or is that to confuse me?). I find it amusing that people feel the need to hide behind a pseudonym whilst making somewhat inapropriate (if not downright disparaging) remarks. Yes, my name IS dapinky!!!! Hey, bud, where did you get the idea that I started the personal attacks on pages 9 / 10 ? I CAN do personal attack, but this is not the time or place for unecessary nonsense! I put forward reasoned argument in a civil and courteous manner, and where i drifted into opinion, it was clearly stated to be such. I believe that if you were to read it correctly (Plain Queens English, not colloquialism) you will have to concede that point! I also think that YOU started the personal attack by completely ripping apart my post in a microanalytical fashion, pouring scorn on anything you didn't like, despite the fact that i backed up all of my points with fact. Even in the world of political debate, there are 'rules' concerning behaviour, and it is still a fact that courtesy is extended to every Member of Parliament when they make a 'maiden speech'. with a member of the opposing party always thanking the 'new boy' for his/her valued contribution to a democratic process. (just because you were ignorant of the particular facts, don't wory about it, we're ALL still learning new things). To quote another passage from Oscar Wilde, "Knowledge comes in two forms, actual knowledge of the subject, and knowing where to find the answers." I believe that you are either deliberately or accidentally misquoting me in your last couple of posts. The dictionary definition I quoted states USUALLY 2 seats, not that a sportscar MUST have 2 seats. This is both good and bad news for your arguments. GOOD = Maclarren F1 can be a sportscar (I personally don't think so, because it has a roof!) BAD = So can any number of cars with 2+2, 4, 5 or more seats (Probably excluding a London Double-decker bus, but no mention of how many storeys a sportscar can have?) Taxcheat - one for you (on a totally unrelated subject), on your signature, you state that Lotus is the plural of Lotus, not Loti, Firstly I assume you're using Websters American Dictionary, not Oxford English???? Secondly, it also depends on whether or not you are refering to cars, flowers or people! As I'm sure you know, Colin Chapman named the car after his daughter, not the flower of the same name.Lets all be friends, after all, we're all Lotus owners here aren't we (some more than others) ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#339 (permalink) | |
|
My Lotus hates my bike.
|
Quote:
FWD != sportscar, no matter how blue in the face you and the M100 posse get trying to convince the rest of the world otherwise ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#340 (permalink) | |
|
My Lotus hates my bike.
|
Quote:
And the second version is much more clear to what I meant to put down so I did. Now as to the rest of your utterly useless banter, I don't know [facetious]I've got no more delusions then those of M100 guys who think their cars are sportscars.[/facetious] >=P |
|
|
|
|