Another Honda Powered Lotus - Page 2 - LotusTalk - The Lotus Cars Community
 
LotusTalk.com is the premier Lotus Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-01-2013, 10:35 AM   #21 (permalink)
6i9
Registered User
 
6i9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,734
Images: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by addertooth View Post
I am still trying to wrap my head around the "why" of the K20 swaps. Similar numbers can be achieved (Hp and torque) with a built 2zz engine and a TVS supercharger. An uprated transmission does make sense. If I am going to go through the challenge of an engine swap, I will likely wait until Monkey Wrench puts their finishing touch on the V6 swap kit they are working on. Or even better, pioneer the hayabusa v8 with 400 plus HP (NA, more supercharged) and a 10500 rpm redline.
__________________
2005 Magnetic Blue Lotus Exige
Drivetrain: Honda K20A Type R | Innovative Kit | Arqray Ti | SCM Intake/Header | Hondata | proRAD | Setrab | KTuned | V2 Fuel Tank | Radium
Aero: Exige Clams | Reverie | TWRD GT-Lip | Craftsquare | IMRP | BSK | Voltex
Suspension: Nitron SA | V2arms | RTDbrace | CE28N | R888 | BOE FF Rotors/Pistons | RC6
Interior: Recaro SPG | Willans | WorksBell | Sparco
6i9 is online now   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 01-01-2013, 10:50 AM   #22 (permalink)
Less is Better
 
me73's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Lynnwood, WA
Posts: 1,002
Quote:
Originally Posted by dstevens View Post
I'd dispute that the numbers are the same - my stock K24 with old M62 makes 270 lbft torque. With a TVS, who knows?
The Honda swap is lighter, stronger, more powerful & more reliable than the 2ZZ with better aftermarket support and availability of parts. Also consider the crank centreline moves down 2 inches and forward another 2-1/2 inches, and the throttle response is better, and the fuel economy is better, the cams don't wear out etc.
But aside from that, there's no reason to swap?

How much lighter is the k24 than the 2zz?
__________________
Elise and Exige, purity, almost everything else suffers from excessive luxury
me73 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2013, 01:10 PM   #23 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 756
Why Honda?

The Honda 2l K motor is very well developed and supported. I do not know if it is that much lighter than the Toyota/Yamaha motor. Some reports around this site quote either 15 pounds less or 20 pounds more....

Immitation is the best form of flattery and the Toyota motor is a bit of a copy and a response to the K20.

There are various 'formula' classes around the world where the K20 is spec'd. Honda tried to displace Ford in F2000, when Ford threatened to stop casting the old 2L blocks. Honda K motors are used in Midget racing. Look at 4piston, 400HP, naturally aspirated!! I would use that for a hell of a track car, although, personally, I like turbo motors.

So, cost-effective, reliable, powerful. The only disadvantage is that the Lotus did not come with it.

Anton
ageshelin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2013, 02:32 PM   #24 (permalink)
Registered User
 
mikelr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Newburgh, New York
Posts: 1,139
Quote:
Originally Posted by ageshelin View Post

Immitation is the best form of flattery and the Toyota motor is a bit of a copy and a response to the K20.


Anton
As is the Honda a copy of the Rover K series...
__________________
00' S1 Exige
94' S4 Esprit (SOLD) :-(
10' Porsche Cayman S
10' Ram Crew cab 1500 hauler
mikelr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2013, 03:51 PM   #25 (permalink)
Registered User
 
dstevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: California
Posts: 760
Images: 16
The 2zz was made to beat the b18c type r engine; it is nothing to the k20a. And if you think the k20a was a copy of the rover, you've been brainwashed by 'king k'.
__________________
2005 Elise with Honda engine
430 hp / 295 lbs torque
dstevens is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2013, 04:10 PM   #26 (permalink)
Less is Better
 
me73's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Lynnwood, WA
Posts: 1,002
Quote:
Originally Posted by dstevens View Post
The 2zz was made to beat the b18c type r engine; it is nothing to the k20a. And if you think the k20a was a copy of the rover, you've been brainwashed by 'king k'.
You beat me to it. The B series Honda engines of the 90s were clearly the inspiration for the 2zz. Honda made 1.6, 1.7, and 1.8 liter engines with the v-tec technology heads developed first on the NSX. All with outstanding power/displacement and reliability. The 1.8L B-series Type-R engine is the one used by Sun International when they were importing the S1 into the states. The 1.7L in my Integra had 200,000 hard driven miles on it when I sold it and was still running strong.
__________________
Elise and Exige, purity, almost everything else suffers from excessive luxury

Last edited by me73; 01-01-2013 at 04:52 PM.
me73 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2013, 08:59 PM   #27 (permalink)
Registered User
 
mikelr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Newburgh, New York
Posts: 1,139
Quote:
Originally Posted by dstevens View Post
The 2zz was made to beat the b18c type r engine; it is nothing to the k20a. And if you think the k20a was a copy of the rover, you've been brainwashed by 'king k'.
I'm not saying it's an exact copy, Honda has taken the design further with roller cams and a stiffer block, but the overall engine architecture started with the Rover K series.
And although Honda has taken the design further it has also porked it up compared to the Rover. This is one of the main reasons S1 cars are so much lighter then S2 variants. The Rover K in my car weighs 300lbs fully dressed with transaxle,starter,alternator,exhaust header, etc... dripping fluids.
__________________
00' S1 Exige
94' S4 Esprit (SOLD) :-(
10' Porsche Cayman S
10' Ram Crew cab 1500 hauler
mikelr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2013, 07:54 AM   #28 (permalink)
Registered User
 
dstevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: California
Posts: 760
Images: 16
How is the k20 a copy of the rover other than both have 4 cylinders and 16 valves?

For the couple of rover to k20a swaps I've been involved in the weight change is about 25 lbs.
__________________
2005 Elise with Honda engine
430 hp / 295 lbs torque
dstevens is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2013, 09:23 AM   #29 (permalink)
Less is Better
 
me73's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Lynnwood, WA
Posts: 1,002
Quote:
Originally Posted by dstevens View Post
How is the k20 a copy of the rover other than both have 4 cylinders and 16 valves?

For the couple of rover to k20a swaps I've been involved in the weight change is about 25 lbs.
Just to clarify, the Rover engine to k20a swap was a reduction of 25lbs? How much of that was exhaust if any? The Rover is lighter than the 2zz, correct?
__________________
Elise and Exige, purity, almost everything else suffers from excessive luxury
me73 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2013, 09:32 AM   #30 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Woodlands Tx
Posts: 2,241
I dont know much about 4 cyl engine families, but 300 hp from a NA 4 cyl is beyond impressive. What makes the K series so great? Are there a few key features or is it a case of alll the details summing to a great package?
__________________
Seriously, my car is small
07 Exige-S, "Landshark"
05 Saffron Yellow "bumbleBee", on to a new owner
Also:
84 930 turbo, 06 WRX Wagon
aschen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2013, 09:46 AM   #31 (permalink)
Registered User
 
mikelr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Newburgh, New York
Posts: 1,139
Quote:
Originally Posted by dstevens View Post
How is the k20 a copy of the rover other than both have 4 cylinders and 16 valves?

For the couple of rover to k20a swaps I've been involved in the weight change is about 25 lbs.
I was talking about the overall engine architecture, the innovative "aluminium sandwich" design utilizing long head bolts that pass through the head, block, mid-block... Rover K was the first to do this.

It's OK to admit that Honda has stood on the shoulders of other engine manufacturers designs .

I'm sure with enough changing of wheels, exhaust and other deletion of parts you could get an S1 to a net +25 lbs over at completely stock K engined car..you only have to make up for 100 lbs or so.

I love how you Honda guys get so defensive of your brand..
__________________
00' S1 Exige
94' S4 Esprit (SOLD) :-(
10' Porsche Cayman S
10' Ram Crew cab 1500 hauler
mikelr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2013, 09:53 AM   #32 (permalink)
Registered User
 
mikelr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Newburgh, New York
Posts: 1,139
Quote:
Originally Posted by aschen View Post
I dont know much about 4 cyl engine families, but 300 hp from a NA 4 cyl is beyond impressive. What makes the K series so great? Are there a few key features or is it a case of alll the details summing to a great package?
This is a case of having all your ducks in a row... a great flowing cylinder head, properly designed intake and exhaust working in harmony with the right cam profiles and 9000 rpm (not to mention another 600cc of displacement).
I'm sure the 2ZZGE could make similar numbers with the same displacement and the right accoutrements.
__________________
00' S1 Exige
94' S4 Esprit (SOLD) :-(
10' Porsche Cayman S
10' Ram Crew cab 1500 hauler
mikelr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2013, 11:47 AM   #33 (permalink)
Registered User
 
dstevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: California
Posts: 760
Images: 16
So calling me a fanboy is a valid counter to my argument?

Honda does not use the head bolt through to bearings, but you'd have to predate aero engines of the 30s to claim to be first with the idea. So exactly what did Honda copy from the rover k? Perhaps the plastic dowels and weak liners?

25 lbs referred to engine swap (engine, trans, exhaust, mounts etc) not other changes.
__________________
2005 Elise with Honda engine
430 hp / 295 lbs torque
dstevens is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2013, 08:15 AM   #34 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Exiged's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 1,638
Quote:
Originally Posted by dstevens View Post
So calling me a fanboy is a valid counter to my argument?

Honda does not use the head bolt through to bearings, but you'd have to predate aero engines of the 30s to claim to be first with the idea. So exactly what did Honda copy from the rover k? Perhaps the plastic dowels and weak liners?

25 lbs referred to engine swap (engine, trans, exhaust, mounts etc) not other changes.
DStevens is anything but a fan boy!


Sent from my iPhone using AutoGuide.com App
Exiged is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2013, 09:32 AM   #35 (permalink)
Registered User
 
mattjk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Down Town LA
Posts: 1,732
you guys do realize dstevens is the owner and brains behind Hondata?
__________________
2009 Monaco White Elise.
1978 Toyota Corolla Sport Coupe.
Canon 5D, Sigma DP1x, Sigma DP2.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zbU0UJAdFj8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jQOnOXXc-ps&
A must watch! Lotus Elise Inside Story
mattjk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2013, 09:35 AM   #36 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Exiged's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 1,638
Quote:
Originally Posted by mattjk View Post
you guys do realize dstevens is the owner and brains behind Hondata?
Yep that's why he is no fan boy!!!!


Sent from my iPhone using AutoGuide.com App
Exiged is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2013, 11:22 PM   #37 (permalink)
Registered User
 
aztec1382's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: los angeles
Posts: 1,494
Images: 12
Fan boy hahaha


Sent from my iPhone using AutoGuide.com Free App
__________________
slwkart
aztec1382 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2013, 01:23 AM   #38 (permalink)
anglophile in exile
 
Aedo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Oz
Posts: 4,861
Images: 100
Quote:
Originally Posted by me73 View Post
Just to clarify, the Rover engine to k20a swap was a reduction of 25lbs? How much of that was exhaust if any? The Rover is lighter than the 2zz, correct?
I always thought the K20 swap added weight to a Rover Elise (25lb seems a fair value)...
Aedo is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2013, 07:37 AM   #39 (permalink)
Less is Better
 
me73's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Lynnwood, WA
Posts: 1,002
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aedo View Post
I always thought the K20 swap added weight to a Rover Elise (25lb seems a fair value)...
The reduction includes exhaust. I suspect this is where the savings comes from.
__________________
Elise and Exige, purity, almost everything else suffers from excessive luxury
me73 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2013, 09:56 AM   #40 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Exiged's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 1,638
Quote:
Originally Posted by addertooth View Post
I am still trying to wrap my head around the "why" of the K20 swaps. Similar numbers can be achieved (Hp and torque) with a built 2zz engine and a TVS supercharger. An uprated transmission does make sense. If I am going to go through the challenge of an engine swap, I will likely wait until Monkey Wrench puts their finishing touch on the V6 swap kit they are working on. Or even better, pioneer the hayabusa v8 with 400 plus HP (NA, more supercharged) and a 10500 rpm redline.
Don't forget the lack of tranny options for the 2zz...

The only real solution is the mr2 5speed conversion or a quaife..run the stock tranny and let's see how it lasts with the 2zz-rev400. And unless you are running race fuel and a fully built motor you can forget 400whp out of a TVS-2zz. See Phil's car for mods and whip results.

My k20 is stock block, pocket port head and a c38-70 Rotrex and I'm at 400whp on pump fuel. That's with boost limited at 15psi and the vision function intercooler.

I am putting in GearX 1-6 close ratio forged chromoly gears in this winter and the tranny should be ready for some serious abuse.

That's why I went Honda!


Sent from my iPhone using AutoGuide.com App
Exiged is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  LotusTalk - The Lotus Cars Community > Lotus Discussions > Powertrain (Engine, Transmission, etc)



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:11 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2
Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.