![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 688
|
Forcedfed Dyno Plot
Hello Guys,
Here is the stock car versus our turbo kitted car! This is a conservative 91 octane map and we made an additional 10 whp and 15 pound feet of torque running our 93 octane map. We still have some fine tuning to do, but this gives you guys a good indication of the power the car is now making. Thanks guys. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Red Alert
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 973
|
Boo-YAH, now that's what I'm talking about, 241hp AND a dyno! Now I'm really interested. Congratulations on getting the kit up and running. Now, if we add reliability and a reasonable price (both of which, I know you are working on) and you will have a lot of people really interested. Good luck with the magazine photoshoot and keep us updated.
__________________
--Ramsen www.euroteknik.com-- Chicago's Premier Euro Community |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Florida
Posts: 159
|
Nice job forcedfed.
![]() I appreciate you keeping the information flowing our way. Judging from the popularity of your previous thread I'd say you have more than a few prospects on this board. Anxiously awaiting more information. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Mountain Road Nut
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Ramona,CA
Posts: 2,292
|
If I am reading the plot correctly, the unmodified engine has more torque and power below 5200 RPM than the boosted one. Is this normal? Some folks were hoping for more, not less, torque at the low end.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) | |
|
On the other side.
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: limbo
Posts: 1,352
|
Quote:
__________________
-- Find me in the fields of Elysium. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
Meow!!
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Leawood, KS
Posts: 2,576
|
Cartest2000 results...
OK, entering extrapolated data from the dyno graph into Cartest2000 I've come up with the following... (including stock dynoed car - for baseline):
Parameter: Stock -> Turbo 0-30mph: 1.49 -> 1.19 seconds 0-60mph: 4.46 -> 3.43 seconds 0-80mph: 7.67 -> 5.75 seconds 0-100mph: 12.07 -> 8.75 seconds 0-150mph: 72.09 -> 22.97 seconds 60-80mph in 3rd gear: 3.34 -> 2.28 seconds 80-100mph in 4th gear: 5.04 -> 3.21 seconds 60': 1.92 -> 1.73 seconds 330': 5.40 -> 4.91 seconds 660': 8.38 @ 84.49mph -> 7.58 @ 95.38mph 1000': 10.92 -> 9.89 seconds 1320': 13.21 @ 103.51mph -> 11.83 @ 117.06mph Top Speed: 150mph -> 169mph Absolutely amazing... well done! Randy, why no HTML? ![]()
__________________
d.a..v...i....d David Thomas Stewart - davidtstewart@gmail.com TVS Supercharged 2005 Graphite Grey Lotus Elise: 286whp, 1781lbs. Lotus cars aren't made, they're hand built from dreams. If you must choose between two evils, pick the one you've never tried before. Last edited by darkSol : 01-21-2005 at 09:53 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 688
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 688
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 688
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 (permalink) | |
|
Meow talk lotus one day?
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 (permalink) |
|
Turbo Elise Slayer
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: San Francisco/Reno
Posts: 615
|
Forcedfed,
I can only imagine how much this will transform and improve the car. If it proves reliable in the next several months, I'm buying.
__________________
1981 Ferrari 308GTSi, red. 2005 Hypersport Elise with roll cage, etc., SY. Katana SC, DA Nitrons, Pagid RS-14s, stainless steel brake lines, RTD brace. 2005 Noble M400, 515 bhp.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 688
|
Re: Cartest2000 results...
Quote:
Traction may be an issue! |
|
|
|
|