![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Beverly Hills
Posts: 1,253
|
How will Lotus treat customers that track/autox their cars?
For the entire time i've been waiting for the Elise, i haven't been able to help but think of other alternatives. At this point i am pretty much torn between an Elise+ a $30-40k more practical car or just going with an SRT-10 Viper. The Viper is quite a bit faster in every situation. However i really do love the entire concept of the Elise and generally like small, go-kart like cars.
Either way this car will be tracked and autocrossed quite a bit. So, one of the deciding factors in my decision is how Lotus is going to treat those of us who really use our cars as expected. With the Viper, my warranty mechanic has said that he will warranty the car no matter what and even will warranty it with mods as long as he installs them. He is the best Viper mechanic around. How do you guys think Lotus will treat us? I really don't want to be in a situation where i have to hide my track use from the dealer and have a major problem if something goes wrong. -Steve |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Beverly Hills
Posts: 1,253
|
Quote:
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Beverly Hills
Posts: 1,253
|
Quote:
btw i had a 97 GTS, cool car. From what i've heard the SRT-10 is much improved in every way. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Beverly Hills
Posts: 1,253
|
Quote:
If i go with the SRT-10 i'm going to get the Mamba edition. The white is SWEET. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
|
I really don't know how any of us could expect Lotus to warranty serious track use, it is very hard on brakes, gearbox, engine, etc. An occasional "driving school" on a track maybe. Autocross is tough also, how much is the question. Look at LCU's position on this, yes it is a performance car but there is a matter of degree here. Let's face it some people will thrash the heck out of their cars and expect the manufacturer to make it good. Where do you draw the line, what warranty claims do you honor and which ones do you reject. It's not an easy straight forward issue. Don't get me wrong I would love LCU to cover any and everything, but I don't think it will make much business sense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Interloper
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 1,480
|
I would expect Lotus to cover anything that isn't clearly due to wear & tear from competition use. I wouldn't expect them to cover "premature" clutch wear, or grooves in the fender liners because the oversized race tires were rubbing.
I don't really think that autocrossing is any harder on the car than the type of spirited road driving that the car is designed for. I bet a run through Deal's Gap or Stelvio would be tougher on the car than a whole bunch of autocrosses.... I think the issue is whether the failure is due to a defect or abuse. Apparently some manufacturers have taken the position that if they can document that the car was autocrossed, then they will automatically deny any warranty claim on that car, even if the problem is not related. If the owner decides to take them to court, they will use the autocross results to prove that the car was "abused". While it would be wonderful to have the manufacturer warranty the engine if it blows up from over-revving in a downshift going into the Andretti hairpin at Laguna Seca, I would settle for them not voiding the warranty on my A/C because I went to an autocross... And yes, there are some sneaky bastards out there who will damage their car in competition, then push/tow it to a nearby public road and then try to claim it on their warranty or insurance...and that is probably why some manufacturers and insurance companies will instantly drop you if they fid out you ever "raced" the car.
__________________
2005 S2000 #42as |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 256
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Beverly Hills
Posts: 1,253
|
i also would never expect them to cover anything that wears excessivly during track use like brakes, pads, clutch, etc.
However, if a car is just being used for occasionally track days, the engine shouldn't blow, bits shouldn't break off, etc. In my mind this is the area in which the Z06 and the Viper have the best advantage. GM and Chrysler will basically warranty ANYTHING. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 (permalink) |
|
Talkin' Loco
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Snohomish, WA
Posts: 1,061
|
When the new viper came out I was a little underwhelmed by its looks as well. I preferred the GTS. After seeing a new srt-10 in person I was amazed. Park Place had a silver one and it was beautiful. The interior is MUCH nicer than the old ones. Photos didn't really do the car justice. It looks much better in person.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Beverly Hills
Posts: 1,253
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|