Lotus Forum Lotus Forum
Go Back   LotusTalk - The Lotus Cars Community > Lotus Discussions > General Discussion (Lotus related)
User Name
Password
Register Home Forums Active Topics Gallery Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


       
Registered Members do not see the above ads. Please Register Today - It's quick and free!
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 10-26-2009, 09:02 AM   #1 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 44
Question Why is Tesla and Lotus the same?

Hi guys... i am very confuse about why Tesla and Lotus are so similar. The interior is 90% same and tesla reflects many identical characteristic with Lotus... Are they a family or Tesla just copied Lotus?
albert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2009, 09:05 AM   #2 (permalink)
2/3 hp to the paws.
 
Simba's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: NY
Posts: 497
They aren't. A Lotus is a fine sporting automobile. A Tesla is a gimmick designed to separate silly people from their money.

(The answer you're looking for is: Lotus builds the chassis and supplies most of the non-driveline running gear for the Tesla)
Simba is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2009, 09:07 AM   #3 (permalink)
Registered User
 
smicker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Alameda, CA
Posts: 410
Images: 2
Tesla contracts with Lotus to build gliders engineered by Tesla and Lotus. The powertrain is then installed in California. Nearly all of the shared parts (about 7%) are in the cabin, which is what you readily see.
__________________
2008 Lotus Exige S240
2006 Lotus Elise RIP
smicker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2009, 09:08 AM   #4 (permalink)
Registered User
 
chemo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 54
That is hilarious.

smb
__________________
2008 Elise SC graphite grey, Touring, Hard Top
2005 Mercedes E320 CDI
1965 Mercedes 230 SL
chemo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2009, 09:10 AM   #5 (permalink)
Registered Crazy Person
 
ANIMAL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 22
Quote:
Originally Posted by Simba View Post
A Tesla is a gimmick designed to separate silly people from their money.
Wait.... I thought that's what Priuses are for.
__________________
Elise -- Coming Soon.
ANIMAL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2009, 09:10 AM   #6 (permalink)
ΒÄŅNED
 
apk919's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Limbo
Posts: 6,281
Images: 20
Quote:
Originally Posted by chemo View Post
That is hilarious.

smb
+1

__________________
* 2009 Lotus Challenge Series Rookie Of The Year *
(Thanks Jim, Tom, Jack, Rob & Spring Mountain Motorsports Ranch!)
My videos: http://www.youtube.com/user/apk919
apk919 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2009, 09:10 AM   #7 (permalink)
G-200 Driver
 
kestrel74's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: North of Detroit; Watkins Glen, NY
Posts: 9,313
__________________
74 Europa Zetec TC Special 3614R
Elise #2292 / Chrome Orange !! / Starshield / Nitron Sport SA / RTDbrace / Uprights machined / Down Low rails / ChaseCam / V1 / SS lines w/ R4-S
"My daily driver does .85 Mach"
" I started flying when Sex was safe and Hang Gliding was dangerous "
BUY My Europa ! http://www.lotustalk.com/forums/f94/...pa-sale-43829/
kestrel74 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2009, 09:11 AM   #8 (permalink)
JWA
#33
 
JWA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Racine, WI
Posts: 3,737
Quote:
Originally Posted by smicker View Post
Tesla contracts with Lotus to build gliders engineered by Tesla and Lotus. The powertrain is then installed in California. Nearly all of the shared parts (about 7%) are in the cabin, which is what you readily see.
That sounds like a curious stat to me. Is the statement that 7% of the parts in a Tesla Roadster are shared with the Elise, or 7% of the Elise parts are present in the Tesla?
JWA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2009, 09:18 AM   #9 (permalink)
Registered User
 
smicker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Alameda, CA
Posts: 410
Images: 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by JWA View Post
That sounds like a curious stat to me. Is the statement that 7% of the parts in a Tesla Roadster are shared with the Elise, or 7% of the Elise parts are present in the Tesla?
Seven percent of the parts in the Roadster are shared with the Elise.
__________________
2008 Lotus Exige S240
2006 Lotus Elise RIP
smicker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2009, 09:18 AM   #10 (permalink)
#101
 
AgentTripleX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 3,101
Apparently Tesla is working on sourcing their next chassis from Daimler and follow a similar process as they did with Lotus on the Roadster. I'm curious which one they'll end up with. It makes sense. R&D is a lot of money, time, and work. If you can start with a chassis you like, tweek it, make it electric, Viola! - there's your new car.
__________________
http://www.facebook.com/SPRVXN
www.twitter.com/autoVXNS
http://sprvxn.tumblr.com/

"We always deceive ourselves twice about the people we love - first to their advantage, then to their disadvantage." Albert Camus

"The refusal to choose is a form of choice; disbelief is a form of belief." Frank Barron
AgentTripleX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2009, 09:36 AM   #11 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 44
I hate Tesla now hahaha feel like its copying Lotus!!!
albert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2009, 09:39 AM   #12 (permalink)
ΒÄŅNED
 
apk919's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Limbo
Posts: 6,281
Images: 20
Quote:
Originally Posted by JWA View Post
That sounds like a curious stat to me. Is the statement that 7% of the parts in a Tesla Roadster are shared with the Elise, or 7% of the Elise parts are present in the Tesla?
Quote:
Originally Posted by smicker View Post
Seven percent of the parts in the Roadster are shared with the Elise.
Is that 7% number calculated from an itemized parts list? Or is it based on weight, volume, or importance?

I'd say the fact that they share the aluminum subframe and most suspension pieces make the 7% number a bit misleading...

I wonder what "percentage" of pieces the VX220 has in common with the Elise?
__________________
* 2009 Lotus Challenge Series Rookie Of The Year *
(Thanks Jim, Tom, Jack, Rob & Spring Mountain Motorsports Ranch!)
My videos: http://www.youtube.com/user/apk919
apk919 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2009, 09:40 AM   #13 (permalink)
JWA
#33
 
JWA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Racine, WI
Posts: 3,737
Quote:
Originally Posted by smicker View Post
Seven percent of the parts in the Roadster are shared with the Elise.
Wow. You would think that they would almost have had to go out of their way to re-design lots of little internal panels, supports, and braces, and change to different nuts and bolts to achieve that. What would the point of that be? Certainly doesn't sound efficient or cost-effective. Or, is the statement related to the Elise model specifically? 7% are shared with the Elise, or 7% are shared with any Lotus? Being that the chassis is actually from the Europa, maybe that's the crux of the statement. And if they drill three different mounting holes in the Europa is that being counted as "not shared"?
JWA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2009, 09:53 AM   #14 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Midland, TX
Posts: 690
You guys all have it wrong, the reason its only 7% is because that's the stuff they couldn't paint green. All the other parts which look strangely familiar to an elise are painted green, so they are "unique" to that car alone.
__________________
2005 Magnetic Blue Elise - "the Lotus" (original I know)
2001 Jeep Wrangler - "soul crusher".
If you dont GET it after you drive it, then you dont GET it - serpent
mrcarcrazy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2009, 09:58 AM   #15 (permalink)
insert clever title here
 
MattG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Living above the clouds in Colorado
Posts: 7,676
Images: 11
Quote:
Originally Posted by apk919 View Post
Is that 7% number calculated from an itemized parts list? Or is it based on weight, volume, or importance?

I'd say the fact that they share the aluminum subframe and most suspension pieces make the 7% number a bit misleading...
I also wonder if they're counting each of the ~6800 batteries separately. I've talked to some Tesla engineers, and they really seemed defensive about having any connection with Lotus, and really wanted to emphasize how it's very different and their own design. I wouldn't be surprised to see them use a part count strategy that worked in their favor (without technically lying).
__________________
'05 Elise, Magnetic Blue / Biscuit / Hardtop / http://eliseinfo.com
Radar detector mounting brackets for sale here
MattG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2009, 10:10 AM   #16 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Frank Amoroso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Boulder. CO
Posts: 358
Quote:
Originally Posted by JWA View Post
That sounds like a curious stat to me. Is the statement that 7% of the parts in a Tesla Roadster are shared with the Elise, or 7% of the Elise parts are present in the Tesla?
Agreed, there certainly seems like a lot more than 7%. Perhaps they mean only 7% of the part numbers match? Things like the brake caliper and rotors, although similar to dimensionally exactly the same, are not the same (caliper doesn't say Lotus, rotor is a 5-bolt hub, etc. etc.). Lug bolts are the same though! Anyway, here are my thoughts on the Tesla, along with pics...

Will this BWR bar fit the Tesla? Oh yeah, my Tesla review for you LTers...

Quote:
Originally Posted by AgentTripleX View Post
Apparently Tesla is working on sourcing their next chassis from Daimler and follow a similar process as they did with Lotus on the Roadster. I'm curious which one they'll end up with. It makes sense. R&D is a lot of money, time, and work. If you can start with a chassis you like, tweek it, make it electric, Viola! - there's your new car.
Precisely. Wouldn't be the first time this has been done, nor will it be the last. Leverage is the name of the game for small volume 'manufacturers!

Quote:
Originally Posted by albert View Post
I hate Tesla now hahaha feel like its copying Lotus!!!
You're kidding right? You hate all the money Lotus is being paid for technical consulting, contract manufacturing, and increasing their economies of scale* such that shared parts (all *ahem* "7%" of 'em) will all have lower cost bases? I, for one(?), welcome it. The two vehicles would never seriously be cross-shopped, it does not dilute the brand IMO and it helps our favorite / economically frail little manufacturer maintain ongoing viabilty. Works for me.

*admittedly, the ~900 extra copies won't move the needle much in this example, but it beats a kick in the headlight.
__________________
Frank Amoroso
Whatever Press Vehicle(s) I'm driving this week
www.twitter.com/famoroso

Ever take a risk? A real risk? The kind of risk that makes you feel alive? It's... spectacular, isn't it?
Frank Amoroso is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2009, 10:11 AM   #17 (permalink)
Mors ab alto
 
dfa2100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Abilene, TX
Posts: 1,040
Quote:
Originally Posted by MattG View Post
I also wonder if they're counting each of the ~6800 batteries separately. I've talked to some Tesla engineers, and they really seemed defensive about having any connection with Lotus, and really wanted to emphasize how it's very different and their own design. I wouldn't be surprised to see them use a part count strategy that worked in their favor (without technically lying).
I think what people forget is that doing something relatively small (though expensive) like lowering the door sills for the Tesla probably changed a whole lot of little parts down the line. Now all of the interior bits have to be changed slightly to fit the new door sills, the frame has just been changed, etc... causing the number of "unique" parts to go really high. But that doesn't mean that the cars are all that much different. Just that Tesla paid a lot of money to have Lotus change stupid little things that ended up causing the price of the Tesla to go up 30 grand from what it would have been otherwise.
__________________
Nightfall Blue, Biscuit Interior, Hardtop

Oh, I have slipped the surly bonds of earth
And danced the skies on laughter-silvered wings...
dfa2100 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2009, 10:35 AM   #18 (permalink)
User, Registered
 
fpitas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Leesburg, VA
Posts: 1,833
Quote:
Originally Posted by albert View Post
Hi guys... i am very confuse about why Tesla and Lotus are so similar. The interior is 90% same and tesla reflects many identical characteristic with Lotus... Are they a family or Tesla just copied Lotus?
It's a conspiracy.

__________________
Francis
2006 Chrome Orange Elise: LSD/TC, Nitron SAs with 425/650 springs, BWR 7/8" Front Bar, Eliseparts bumpsteer kit, VF Stage 2, 2bular Header + Sport Cat + 8x24 GT3 Muffler, ECU Tune by Jermaine, Smaay's fuel rail, ACT XT clutch, Saikou Michi dual catch can, Moroso pan, Manly's mount inserts & FF Engine Damper
2000 Black Integra Type R: - 213,000 miles...running again!
fpitas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2009, 11:13 AM   #19 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Midland, TX
Posts: 690
Quote:
Originally Posted by fpitas View Post
It's a conspiracy.

And I just threw out my foil hat. DAMN, gotta make a new one.
__________________
2005 Magnetic Blue Elise - "the Lotus" (original I know)
2001 Jeep Wrangler - "soul crusher".
If you dont GET it after you drive it, then you dont GET it - serpent
mrcarcrazy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2009, 11:21 AM   #20 (permalink)
Denuo Volatilis
 
...m...'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,716
...tesla contracted lotus to supply a finished elise chassis for which they then contracted another supplier to provide an electric drivetrain, with final assembly (i think) done by tesla themselves in california...

...nothing at all wrong with that - they're providing a novel finished product which no other company is currently bringing to the consumer market - but most of the undertone of resentment stems from their marketing efforts to distinguish themselves as engineers despite the fact that very little of their engineering was done in-house...hence the seven percent shared content factoid, based on every superficially-tweaked elise part technically not being shared, despite more-or-less being the same part originally engineered by lotus, and likewise their drivetrain...

...it's analogous to one of my clients requesting that i move a door, shift a few rooms and windows here and there, and then selecting paint colors and claiming to have designed her own house, followed by a high-profile campaign advertising herself as an architect...to-date, tesla has substantially been a marketing company following the silicon valley dot-com template, and some of us can't resist the opportunity to point out the ephemeral nature of the emperor's finest regalia...

...i still think the tesla roadster is a very cool product, and hope for the sake of an underserved market and the impassioned people at tesla who sincerely support their efforts that they're able to transition to a genuinely productive business model, but their hype machine certainly gets in the way pretty often...
__________________
2005 Federal Elise | Touring | Storm Titanium
...73,000 miles and aging beautifully...

2000 New Beetle | Turbo | Reflex Silver
...107,000 miles of steadfast service...

Last edited by ...m... : 10-26-2009 at 11:37 AM.
...m... is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

  LotusTalk - The Lotus Cars Community > Lotus Discussions > General Discussion (Lotus related)



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0