Lotus Forum Lotus Forum
Go Back   LotusTalk - The Lotus Cars Community > Lotus Discussions > Suspension (including wheels, tires, brakes)
User Name
Password
Register Home Forums Active Topics Gallery Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


       
Registered Members do not see the above ads. Please Register Today - It's quick and free!
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 12-12-2008, 09:06 AM   #1 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 125
Question Corner balance help

The rear shocks on my '06 Exige with track pack were replaced under warranty. The dealer also had the car realigned and corner balanced as part of the service. My question is around the corner balance. This shop stated it was more important to have the front tires evenly weighted than cross weights even. This is different than I've heard previously. Should I be concerned?

Mixed use but most important for track use, most fun with driver only but regularly have passengers/students.

Measured Corner Weights w/ driver
LF 423
RF 422
LR 715
RR 616
Measured Weight Distribution
Total Weight 2176
Front-to-Rear
Front 845 38.83 %
Rear 1331 61.17 %
Side-to-Side
Left 1138 52.30 %
Right 1038 47.70 %
Diagonal Weight
Left Front / Right Rear 1039
Right Front / Left Rear 1137
__________________
Peter Fanning

2008 Persian Blue Exige S240 - track, touring
2006 CO Exige - RIP
pfanning is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2008, 09:42 AM   #2 (permalink)
ΒÄŅNED
 
apk919's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Limbo
Posts: 6,281
Images: 20
Quote:
Originally Posted by pfanning View Post
The rear shocks on my '06 Exige with track pack were replaced under warranty. The dealer also had the car realigned and corner balanced as part of the service. My question is around the corner balance. This shop stated it was more important to have the front tires evenly weighted than cross weights even. This is different than I've heard previously. Should I be concerned?

Mixed use but most important for track use, most fun with driver only but regularly have passengers/students.

Measured Corner Weights w/ driver
LF 423
RF 422
LR 715
RR 616
Measured Weight Distribution
Total Weight 2176
Front-to-Rear
Front 845 38.83 %
Rear 1331 61.17 %
Side-to-Side
Left 1138 52.30 %
Right 1038 47.70 %
Diagonal Weight
Left Front / Right Rear 1039
Right Front / Left Rear 1137
Hmm... I wonder why they'd say that... "corner balanced" means, well, balancing the diagonal corner weights, not L/R or F/R. Your cross % is 1137/2176 or 52.3%... it should be much closer to 50.0%

Of course, it matters a bit whether the car is ballasted for one or two occupants... (was it ballasted properly?)

EDIT: Did they measure ride height, by the way? I usually measure/set ride height first, then corner balance...
__________________
* 2009 Lotus Challenge Series Rookie Of The Year *
(Thanks Jim, Tom, Jack, Rob & Spring Mountain Motorsports Ranch!)
My videos: http://www.youtube.com/user/apk919

Last edited by apk919 : 12-12-2008 at 09:50 AM.
apk919 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2008, 11:37 AM   #3 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 125
Quote:
Originally Posted by apk919 View Post
Hmm... I wonder why they'd say that... "corner balanced" means, well, balancing the diagonal corner weights, not L/R or F/R. Your cross % is 1137/2176 or 52.3%... it should be much closer to 50.0%

Of course, it matters a bit whether the car is ballasted for one or two occupants... (was it ballasted properly?)

EDIT: Did they measure ride height, by the way? I usually measure/set ride height first, then corner balance...
The car was ballasted for the driver. Ride height is LF 125, RF 126, LR 128, RR 128.

The diagonal is the issue I'm concerned about.
__________________
Peter Fanning

2008 Persian Blue Exige S240 - track, touring
2006 CO Exige - RIP
pfanning is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2008, 12:30 PM   #4 (permalink)
registered nipple
 
fishguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,780
Images: 1
you want your cross weights to be %50 or really close+-1% to that, with you sitting in the car, and gas level at about the average of when you are tracking it.
also set your tire psi where you set them at the track. if you know the hot temps on track thats best also.
make them redo it correctly.
__________________
2008-2009 SCCA AZ Regional "Driver of the Year"
1986 Swift DB-1 Sold
2008 HSR-West FF 3rd generation Champion
2008 "The Series" FF 3rd generation Champion
1987 Porsche Spec 944
2008-2009 season SCCA AZ regional Champion
fishguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2008, 12:40 PM   #5 (permalink)
ΒÄŅNED
 
apk919's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Limbo
Posts: 6,281
Images: 20
Quote:
Originally Posted by fishguy View Post
you want your cross weights to be %50 or really close+-1% to that, with you sitting in the car, and gas level at about the average of when you are tracking it.
also set your tire psi where you set them at the track. if you know the hot temps on track thats best also.
make them redo it correctly.
+1

My '07 S is a bit heavier than your '06, but here are my corner weights:

LF: 467# RF: 442#
LR: 715# RR: 682#

Cross: 1157/2306 = 50.17%
__________________
* 2009 Lotus Challenge Series Rookie Of The Year *
(Thanks Jim, Tom, Jack, Rob & Spring Mountain Motorsports Ranch!)
My videos: http://www.youtube.com/user/apk919
apk919 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2008, 12:44 PM   #6 (permalink)
Registered User
 
EricH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 621
My cross weights are off about that much, it is a problem. It oversteers in tight right handers and understeers in tight left handers.
__________________

Click links to see my 2008 Lotus Exige-S 240 , '99 M3, 505rwhp '89 Mustang ( sold) , '05 WRX STI ( sold) homepages or here for my M3 vid (11MB)
EricH is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2008, 12:48 PM   #7 (permalink)
registered nipple
 
fishguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,780
Images: 1
Talking

Quote:
Originally Posted by pfanning View Post
This shop stated it was more important to have the front tires evenly weighted than cross weights even. This is different than I've heard previously. Should I be concerned?
you should be concerned only if you care that the people who are working on your car have their heads up their A$$e$.

I wonder what other great things they have done to your car to "improve it".
__________________
2008-2009 SCCA AZ Regional "Driver of the Year"
1986 Swift DB-1 Sold
2008 HSR-West FF 3rd generation Champion
2008 "The Series" FF 3rd generation Champion
1987 Porsche Spec 944
2008-2009 season SCCA AZ regional Champion
fishguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2008, 06:24 PM   #8 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 125
Quote:
Originally Posted by fishguy View Post
you should be concerned only if you care that the people who are working on your car have their heads up their A$$e$.

I wonder what other great things they have done to your car to "improve it".
Yeah, this shop hasn't done any work for me. It was part of the warranty replacement of the rear shocks.

I talked to the owner, he's certain this will work well so I'll give it a try. I asked specifically about the cross weight effect on left vs. right turns. He claimed that's more a function of the alignment than corner balance. Not sure I believe him.

At least worth the experiment. Worst case I take to my preferred shop and pay for an alignment/corner balance.
__________________
Peter Fanning

2008 Persian Blue Exige S240 - track, touring
2006 CO Exige - RIP
pfanning is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

  LotusTalk - The Lotus Cars Community > Lotus Discussions > Suspension (including wheels, tires, brakes)



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0