![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#21 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: CT
Posts: 133
|
I think maybe some people don't realize that roll does not affect the total amount of weight transfer at all. It just changes the timing of the transfer and the distribution front/rear. More roll does NOT mean more overall weight transfer, although it sure looks like it would at a glance. Total weight transfer is actually only a function of track width and CG height.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 (permalink) |
|
Keep it simple and real
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Southern California
Posts: 926
|
Yes.
Dropping ride height by 10mm to 120mm, thereby lowering the overall CG, would make sense before proceeding to firmer springs. My body roll focus is to reduce the amount of transfer time. Lowering should cause additional ride firmness and less roll because of the incremental compression of springs and lower CG. It would be a good step toward slightly better handling as well as less body roll with my TP equipped Exige.
__________________
'06 Exige - Ph. Black/Touring/Track/LSD/TC/SS. Mods: corner balanced - RTD brace - Manly's inserts - decambered - Pagid Blacks - Motul fluid - tow hooks - Schroth belts - extinguisher - AIM timer - Green Filter - Larini - oil temp & pressure gauges - AO48s & Rotas on track - T1Rs & OEM wheels on street - rear camera & monitor - Stebel horn - speakers upgraded, sub & iPod controller - DRL disable switch - aux. fuse panel - sill pockets - leather console - Bootie - roof scoop functional. |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 (permalink) | |
|
High Roller
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
96 Ferrari F355 Berlinetta 06 Lotus Elise Supercharged - SOLD ![]() 88 BMW 528is |
|
|
|
|