Lotus Forum Lotus Forum
Go Back   LotusTalk - The Lotus Cars Community > Motorsports > Solo timed events
User Name
Password
Register Home Forums Active Topics Gallery Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


       
Registered Members do not see the above ads. Please Register Today - It's quick and free!
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 05-20-2009, 02:23 AM   #1 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 110
Track pack & auto X

Searched the forum and no clear answers...

Elise with track pack running A048's. Rear's are new but fronts are basically shot.

Thinking about going with a set of R888.

Anyhow, mostly street & mountain road driving with occasional track and auto X runs.

Don't want the BWR bar, not looking for Hoosiers or V710's. I want R's for the street and track on one set of rims with my existing track pack set up.

I'm having an issue with the car pushing, front bar is in the mid setting and shocks are set to Lotus track set up.

Will 205's make a difference over 195's with this car?

Some people suggest the front track pack bar at max stiffness... Others suggest stiff rear shocks and soft front...

I've removed all shims up front and could use some proven suggestions given my existing set up with the exception of new tires which I will purchase.

Should I crank my front bar and try things out with new rubber or leave it?

Lets hear some thoughts.

Cheers,
willhogan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2009, 09:50 AM   #2 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 110
Nobody?
willhogan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2009, 09:53 AM   #3 (permalink)
User Restricted By ΑDMIΝ
 
apk919's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Limbo
Posts: 6,281
Images: 20
Get as much negative camber in the front as possible (with the stock suspension). In my experience, it has the largest effect on front grip.

If you're running in a stock class, that mean no shims except for the ABS brackets. Otherwise, machine your steering arms/uprights or get a set of modified steering arms.

Heavy use of trailbraking will help get the car to turn in, but doesn't do much for you mid corner or on exit...

Lower the front ride height to 120mm

Also, I believe you <b>soften</b> the front sway bar for less understeer....
__________________
* 2009 Lotus Challenge Series Rookie Of The Year *
(Thanks Jim, Tom, Jack, Rob & Spring Mountain Motorsports Ranch!)
My videos: http://www.youtube.com/user/apk919
apk919 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2009, 11:33 AM   #4 (permalink)
User, Registered
 
fpitas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Leesburg, VA
Posts: 1,827
Quote:
Originally Posted by apk919 View Post
Get as much negative camber in the front as possible (with the stock suspension). In my experience, it has the largest effect on front grip.

If you're running in a stock class, that mean no shims except for the ABS brackets. Otherwise, machine your steering arms/uprights or get a set of modified steering arms.

Heavy use of trailbraking will help get the car to turn in, but doesn't do much for you mid corner or on exit...

Lower the front ride height to 120mm

Also, I believe you <b>soften</b> the front sway bar for less understeer....
Usually true, but if a car leans a fair amount, the reduction in front positive camber can make a big enough difference that the bigger front bar can cause less understeer. It happened to a small extent when I put the 7/8" bar on the Elise, and I've had it happen rather dramatically on other cars. Of course, if you crank in enough static negative camber in front the effect goes away.
__________________
Francis
2006 Chrome Orange Elise: LSD/TC, Nitron SAs with 425/650 springs, BWR 7/8" Front Bar, Eliseparts bumpsteer kit, VF Stage 2, 2bular Header + Sport Cat + 8x24 GT3 Muffler, ECU Tune by Jermaine, Smaay's fuel rail, ACT XT clutch, Saikou Michi dual catch can, Moroso pan, Manly's mount inserts & FF Engine Damper
2000 Black Integra Type R: - 213,000 miles...running again!
fpitas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2009, 02:24 PM   #5 (permalink)
User Restricted By ΑDMIΝ
 
apk919's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Limbo
Posts: 6,281
Images: 20
Quote:
Originally Posted by fpitas View Post
Usually true, but if a car leans a fair amount, the reduction in front positive camber can make a big enough difference that the bigger front bar can cause less understeer. It happened to a small extent when I put the 7/8" bar on the Elise, and I've had it happen rather dramatically on other cars. Of course, if you crank in enough static negative camber in front the effect goes away.
That makes sense...
__________________
* 2009 Lotus Challenge Series Rookie Of The Year *
(Thanks Jim, Tom, Jack, Rob & Spring Mountain Motorsports Ranch!)
My videos: http://www.youtube.com/user/apk919
apk919 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2009, 03:54 PM   #6 (permalink)
My car is really small
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Woodlands Tx
Posts: 390
My non-professional opinion is that the fronts being way more worn/heat cycled than the rears is your problem. The Bwr sway bar really helped my car (on streets) because it tamed the rear end and helped keep the inside rear planted to power out more agressively. I dont think stiffening the front sway is a good recipe to reduce understeer in these cars....
__________________
05 Safron Yellow "bumbleBee"
A terrible car, but a great toy
02 mazda protge 5 "shagginwagin"
84 930 turbo "no nickname yet"
aschen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2009, 04:21 PM   #7 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 110
Im confused... I thought the BWR bar is stiffer than the stiffest setting on the track pack bar.

Therefore stiff is exactly what you've got.
willhogan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2009, 06:07 PM   #8 (permalink)
My car is really small
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Woodlands Tx
Posts: 390
Quote:
Originally Posted by willhogan View Post
Im confused... I thought the BWR bar is stiffer than the stiffest setting on the track pack bar.

Therefore stiff is exactly what you've got.
Exactly, but I most deffinately was not trying to cure understeer. I was trying to cure a twitchy rear end which the bwr bar accomplised well.
__________________
05 Safron Yellow "bumbleBee"
A terrible car, but a great toy
02 mazda protge 5 "shagginwagin"
84 930 turbo "no nickname yet"
aschen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2009, 11:25 AM   #9 (permalink)
No more cone damage!
 
Surferjer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Exton, PA
Posts: 8,885
The Elise faces the painful issue of a push and rear wheel spin, even with a limited slip. The push can be dealt with other ways, but you must keep rear wheels on the ground to put down the power, especially coming out of a turn. Pick your poison, there is no magic elixir. With adjustable shocks there are other things you can do to help, but the core problem never truly goes away.
__________________
Jer-2005 Elise (retired from autox)
1993 MR2 autox car
2002 Ford Excursion DIESEL 4 X 4
1993 Miata (throwout bearing or clutch failure)
1987 Toyota Corolla FX16 Lemons car (needs new head)
1984 Chevy Citation Lemons car (needs a motor)
Surferjer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2009, 12:30 PM   #10 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: orange county
Posts: 1,184
Images: 26
First get new tires. If your fronts are shot you will never stop this car from pushing.

I have TP on my car but I also have a limited slip dif. My car now is a little bit loose in the rear. I have removed front shims, I think I removed 2 shims (from both sides) rear, and my swaybar is in the middle.

Before I removed the front shims I had the swaybar adjusted to P4, a longer lever arm, trying to get the front to stick better. After removing the front shims my car was vary lose in the rear and would swap ends vary EZ. Had to remove rear shims and reposition the swaybar back to P3 to get it to balance out. Now I like it and the rear is just a little loose. I may try the swaybar in P2 just to try it out.

Well that’s what I have done so far.
Also double-check your ride height.

Just to be sure I’m remembering my terms right….

Push/understeer >> you go straight and crash with the nose of the car. Go softer on the front swaybar to get less push. (if this car had a rear swaybar you could go stiffer in the rear too)

Loose/oversteer >> you spin and crash ass first. (if this car had a rear swaybar you could soffen the rear too)

The side that losses grip has to much stiffness relative to the side that sticks.

If I got this backwards someone set me straight.
__________________
Track Pack, LSD, & Touring Pack
Green Ghost is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2009, 04:02 PM   #11 (permalink)
Exige enthusiast...
 
sandsmuseum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 775
Images: 33
or change your driving style...

In my experience, both the Exige and the Elise suffer from corner entry understeer. It is made worse by too fast corner entry and the car responds well to slow in - fast out.

The problem is even worse with a limited slip differential and the LSD slows the outside rear tire more than the inside due to engine compression.

I found a slight change in my driving style helped tremendously, as a less aggressive corner entry, earlier braking, helped reduce the understeer.

Michael
__________________
www.sandsmuseum.com
antique coin op repair
mod for the Library on EliseTalk
sandsmuseum is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

  LotusTalk - The Lotus Cars Community > Motorsports > Solo timed events



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0