Why SUV's are the new go to vehicle. - Page 3 - LotusTalk - The Lotus Cars Community
 15Likes
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #41 of 61 (permalink) Old 10-14-2018, 10:08 AM
Registered User
 
senna's daddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 492
Quote:
Originally Posted by brgelise View Post
Let's assume the XC40 is the basis for the Lotus SUV.. Logic dictates. Let's hope they target the Stelvio and then some. Make it 180 inches and 3500 pounds instead of 185 inches and 4000 pounds. And please no ugly Porsche looks.

SUV is actually an archaic term. These are 21st century hatchbacks. Next thing you know, Germany will conjer up another blasphenus term like 4 door coupe or their SAV BS. Multitasker comes to mind as they do everything.
I concur, the SUVs replaced the country squires of our youth, but some "crossovers" are looking suspiciously like station wagons again; let's see how long before the fake wood gets applied to the sides or real burl walnut in the case of a RR or Bently shooting break.
Attached Images
   
senna's daddy is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #42 of 61 (permalink) Old 10-14-2018, 11:25 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Central Virginia
Posts: 410
Garage
Had this exact conversation in the parking lot waiting for boy scouts to get loaded into family trucksters. We were comparing a friend's well-loved Honda Pilot, which has actual off-road capability with a Toyota Rav4 (about five years newer), a Mopar minivan, a 4-dr Jeep JL Wrangler, and a Subaru wagon.

Conclusion: the sube wagon is the same vehicle the Rav4 is but with better utility because it doesn't fake being an offroad vehicle -- same ground clearance, same wheelbase, but driveline takes up less cubage, so isn't so tall, thus has less aero drag. The Pilot, surprisingly, had the same (out of the box) off-road capability as the Jeep, but had more interior volume (and attendant comfort) because it didn't have a ladder frame and conventional driveline eating up otherwise useful space.

I suspect the sube handles the best of them as well, as its CG is at least 6" lower than anything else in the list. The minivan is probably second.

The Grand Caravan had an insanely clever flat-floor stowing 60/40 third row seat option that showed that somebody at Daimler Chrysler (as it was at that time) understood why people buy minivans. It had no sex appeal, but it hauled a lot of scouts and gear, just like it was supposed to.

The Wrangler makes lots of sense only if you want your serious off-road vehicle to have four doors and mod it into a serious offroad vehicle. A stock one is an awful station wagon, but that's what people use them for.

A whole lot of bad compromises, most of which are caused by function following form, which is in turn caused by buyers being unwilling to admit that they need a station wagon or a utility people hauler (minivan), and not a vehicle that actually involves 'sport' (on or off pavement) in any way.
steelypip is offline  
post #43 of 61 (permalink) Old 10-15-2018, 12:24 PM Thread Starter
Registered User
 
brgelise's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: CT
Posts: 6,024
That is why I call my Stelvio a Guilia wagon. Long as it goes up and down the side of the mountain in winter with 4 snows, its good to me.

16 Maserati GranTurismo Sport Ext Campio /Grigio Chronos w/full MC Carbon Fiber interior trim, Stock for now
18 Alfa Romeo Stelvio Visconti Verde/Brown Leather Remus Catback,Eurocompulsion Phase 2 V2 intake, 390HP/443ft-lb Tq!
16 Range Rover Sport HSE, Montalcino Red w/Ivory Leather-[/COLOR]- 456HP/412ft-lb Tq
12 Maxda MX-5 Miata GT PRHT True Red/Black leather
11 Lotus Evora "S" Persian Blue, Grey/Black Suedetex/Leather
brgelise is offline  
 
post #44 of 61 (permalink) Old 01-28-2019, 06:13 AM Thread Starter
Registered User
 
brgelise's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: CT
Posts: 6,024
Any doubts of its potency are completely banished with the Phase 2 tune. This thing is silly quick now!!

Only thing I have not yet considered is installing the Eibach springs because it rides and handles so damn well stock!!

16 Maserati GranTurismo Sport Ext Campio /Grigio Chronos w/full MC Carbon Fiber interior trim, Stock for now
18 Alfa Romeo Stelvio Visconti Verde/Brown Leather Remus Catback,Eurocompulsion Phase 2 V2 intake, 390HP/443ft-lb Tq!
16 Range Rover Sport HSE, Montalcino Red w/Ivory Leather-[/COLOR]- 456HP/412ft-lb Tq
12 Maxda MX-5 Miata GT PRHT True Red/Black leather
11 Lotus Evora "S" Persian Blue, Grey/Black Suedetex/Leather
brgelise is offline  
post #45 of 61 (permalink) Old 01-28-2019, 07:12 AM
Registered User
 
David Craig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,871
I'm amused that people don't want minivans anymore. But these days the larger SUVs look very much little minivans with higher road clearance and less interior space.

I'll stick with sedans.
me73 likes this.
David Craig is offline  
post #46 of 61 (permalink) Old 01-28-2019, 08:20 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Circuit of the Americas.
Posts: 45
No matter how this story is spun, a Lotus SUV is a shame to the brand. It is an abhorent idea that Hethel needs to drop. There are other ways for the company to thrive assuming Lotus is still being run by competent people and not mediocre utilitarians.

If we are just talking utility, why not a station wagon?

SMH!!
me73 and Varun916 like this.
Octonion is offline  
post #48 of 61 (permalink) Old 01-28-2019, 05:54 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Posts: 40
I have always though people buy SUVís not because of their versatility but because they do not like sitting low to the ground. They like being equal or taller then everyone around them.

I also do not look at possibility of Lotus making a SUV as a shame for the brand. I think itís a shame most manufacturers who use to produce great cars have had to go this direction to turn a profit and ensure their future. Alfa, BMW, Lamborghini, Porsche and I am sure many others will follow.

Be it good or bad itís the world we live in
NC25T is offline  
post #49 of 61 (permalink) Old 01-28-2019, 07:03 PM
Less is Better
 
me73's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Issaquah, WA
Posts: 2,313
Quote:
Originally Posted by NC25T View Post
I have always though people buy SUVís not because of their versatility but because they do not like sitting low to the ground. They like being equal or taller then everyone around them.

I also do not look at possibility of Lotus making a SUV as a shame for the brand. I think itís a shame most manufacturers who use to produce great cars have had to go this direction to turn a profit and ensure their future. Alfa, BMW, Lamborghini, Porsche and I am sure many others will follow.

Be it good or bad itís the world we live in
It's true, but we still don't have to like it. We all drive little cars and know that it's annoying at least but dangerous at most that we can't see around these things and can't be seen by people in them. I buy wagons.
me73 is offline  
post #50 of 61 (permalink) Old 01-29-2019, 06:05 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 2,058
Quote:
Originally Posted by NC25T View Post
I have always though people buy SUVís not because of their versatility but because they do not like sitting low to the ground. They like being equal or taller then everyone around them.

I also do not look at possibility of Lotus making a SUV as a shame for the brand. I think itís a shame most manufacturers who use to produce great cars have had to go this direction to turn a profit and ensure their future. Alfa, BMW, Lamborghini, Porsche and I am sure many others will follow.

Be it good or bad itís the world we live in
Agree it can't be the versatility. With the ever more-sloping back lights, there is essentially no cargo space anyway. If you look at profiles of most SUV's, say in the small to mid-large category, note the distance between the top of the rear seat back and the rear glass. It's awfully small. They get around this by lengthening the load floor, but cubic inches on a chart doesn't convert to real world utility at all.
Dylan is offline  
post #51 of 61 (permalink) Old 01-29-2019, 06:22 AM
Registered User
 
4380r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Maryland
Posts: 6,452
Quote:
Originally Posted by Octonion View Post
No matter how this story is spun, a Lotus SUV is a shame to the brand. It is an abhorent idea that Hethel needs to drop. There are other ways for the company to thrive assuming Lotus is still being run by competent people and not mediocre utilitarians.

If we are just talking utility, why not a station wagon?

SMH!!
I don't agree. If Chapman were alive today, and he needed an SUV to keep the brand alive so that he could pay for racing and his interest in aviation, he'd do it in a minute.

Yes, he was a brilliant designer (although many of the race cars he designed weren't particularly safe) but he was also a businessman, known to cut corners to make ends meet. The original Renault engine in the S1 and S2 Europas weren't there because of their technology, power, etc. It's because he was able to cut a deal for a cheap engine with a trans-axle he could make work in a mid-engined car. The Eclat, Excel and S2 Elite were comparative pork pies compared to the street cars he'd built up to that time, and gasp...were four seaters!!!

Not only would he have signed off on an SUV, he'd probably have been interested in actually designing it. By most accounts by the end he'd all but lost interest in the street car business in favor of racing and his aviation hobby/interests. It's known that his interest in street cars was pretty much limited to their contribution to paying for his racing efforts.

Instructively, the Cayenne basically saved Porsche's bacon.

Owned, loved, enjoyed, and now gone:
1969 Europa S2 Blue
1970 Europa S2 White
1974 Europa Twin Cam Blue
1974 Europa Twin Cam Blue
1984 Turbo Esprit Calypso Red
2005 Elise Starlight Black
2005 Elise Saffron Yellow
2005 Elise Ardent Red
2006 Exige Graphite Grey
2007 Exige Canyon Red

Other:
1970 MGB GT
1970 Datsun 510
1984 Honda CRX Si
1984 Pontiac Fiero
2004 Chrysler Crossfire
2009 Pontiac Solstice Coupe
4380r is offline  
post #52 of 61 (permalink) Old 01-29-2019, 06:41 AM
Less is Better
 
me73's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Issaquah, WA
Posts: 2,313
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dylan View Post
Agree it can't be the versatility. With the ever more-sloping back lights, there is essentially no cargo space anyway. If you look at profiles of most SUV's, say in the small to mid-large category, note the distance between the top of the rear seat back and the rear glass. It's awfully small. They get around this by lengthening the load floor, but cubic inches on a chart doesn't convert to real world utility at all.
I tested this exact scenario once. Loaded up a 2008 Subaru impreza hatchback, which I think everyone would agree is a small car, with bags, kids car seat, people. Then unloaded the exact same stuff into a 4 door Range Rover Sport. I had to put one of the bags that fit into the Subaru into someone's lap and the front seat passenger, who was comfortable in the Subaru, had to move their seat all the way forward in the Range Rover to fit the car seat in back. That Range Rover is a complete packaging failure.
me73 is offline  
post #53 of 61 (permalink) Old 01-29-2019, 07:28 AM
Registered User
 
David Craig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,871
I once picked up a 32 inch tube TV at BestBuy. The sales guy said "where is your truck" and I pulled up in a hatchback Toyota Tercel and successfully managed to take the TV home.
David Craig is offline  
post #54 of 61 (permalink) Old 02-17-2019, 10:22 AM Thread Starter
Registered User
 
brgelise's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: CT
Posts: 6,024
So you compared the Subie with back seats up to the RRS with back seats up. You said you are carrying people. I find that suspiciously BS laden.
Drop the back seats and only consider 2 people and the BS inflates. Cargo footage numbers don't lie.

16 Maserati GranTurismo Sport Ext Campio /Grigio Chronos w/full MC Carbon Fiber interior trim, Stock for now
18 Alfa Romeo Stelvio Visconti Verde/Brown Leather Remus Catback,Eurocompulsion Phase 2 V2 intake, 390HP/443ft-lb Tq!
16 Range Rover Sport HSE, Montalcino Red w/Ivory Leather-[/COLOR]- 456HP/412ft-lb Tq
12 Maxda MX-5 Miata GT PRHT True Red/Black leather
11 Lotus Evora "S" Persian Blue, Grey/Black Suedetex/Leather
brgelise is offline  
post #55 of 61 (permalink) Old 02-17-2019, 10:56 AM
Less is Better
 
me73's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Issaquah, WA
Posts: 2,313
Quote:
Originally Posted by brgelise View Post
So you compared the Subie with back seats up to the RRS with back seats up. You said you are carrying people. I find that suspiciously BS laden.
Drop the back seats and only consider 2 people and the BS inflates. Cargo footage numbers don't lie.
Not Sport, Evoque, apologies for the mis-step. Thanks for your polite consideration.
me73 is offline  
post #56 of 61 (permalink) Old 02-17-2019, 11:02 AM
Registered User
 
senna's daddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 492
I think we'll see a convergence of electric power and SUVs, like this Bollinger which is a perfect fit for Lotus' bonded aluminum origami method of construction.

https://www.bollingermotors.com/
Attached Images
 
senna's daddy is offline  
post #57 of 61 (permalink) Old 02-18-2019, 07:36 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Central Virginia
Posts: 410
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by senna's daddy View Post
I think we'll see a convergence of electric power and SUVs, like this Bollinger which is a perfect fit for Lotus' bonded aluminum origami method of construction.
The Tesla model of having a flat 'sled' battery under the floor makes a lot of sense for a station wagon. A little clever Lotus-style engineering would allow the battery box to be the structural floor (and a chassis structural member in tension and torsion) with just a little shell of aluminum sheet or blow molded plastic above to hold the carpet in when the battery was out. With a GT car, something like the Volt's center spine battery makes more sense.

I've always felt that Tesla could have done a lot better job with the model X if they'd actually been willing to optimize the vehicle. Too much bling and not enough function.
steelypip is offline  
post #58 of 61 (permalink) Old 02-18-2019, 03:48 PM
Registered User
 
senna's daddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 492
Quote:
Originally Posted by steelypip View Post
The Tesla model of having a flat 'sled' battery under the floor makes a lot of sense for a station wagon. A little clever Lotus-style engineering would allow the battery box to be the structural floor (and a chassis structural member in tension and torsion) with just a little shell of aluminum sheet or blow molded plastic above to hold the carpet in when the battery was out. With a GT car, something like the Volt's center spine battery makes more sense.

I've always felt that Tesla could have done a lot better job with the model X if they'd actually been willing to optimize the vehicle. Too much bling and not enough function.
Funny you say that about the Tesla, I've always thought that Elon cut a deal with Lotus and used the stillborn Elite for the design of the Model S.
Attached Images
   
senna's daddy is offline  
post #59 of 61 (permalink) Old 02-18-2019, 05:34 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Central Virginia
Posts: 410
Garage
I specifically didn't mention the S because I think it actually hits its design check boxes pretty well. Not as well as it might if it were designed by Lotus chassis engineers, but well enough. I'd define it as a sport sedan instead of a GT car, though, along with things like the Alfa Giulia and BMW 5 series. The flat underfloor battery makes some sense in the S (mostly to put all the battery mass as low as possible), but a lot of the potential to make a large, comfortable space in an efficiently sized car is wasted by the wide center console in many models (gotta emphasize that big, blingy touchscreen). If you're going to make such a wide car you might as well put the battery partially in a center spine (a vestigial driveshaft hump, like Corvairs had), which both adds rigidity and reduces the thickness required of the floor where peoples' feet go while maintaining the same KWH capacity.

Among Teslas, my complaint is with the model X (which is Tesla's current 'SUV/Crossover' offering, and thus on topic). I think a focused clean sheet of paper design (it shares 30% parts with the S) would not have resulted in something that looks so much like a Model S with water retention, nor would it have silly gullwing doors, nor would it have such an inefficient seating arrangement. The whole vehicle seems to be an example of function following form, which is antithetical to any Lotus philosophy (either the stated one or the jaded/realistic one). They had the bits to make a truly amazing car but made a blingy cash cow instead.
steelypip is offline  
post #60 of 61 (permalink) Old 02-18-2019, 06:16 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Elizabeth City, NC
Posts: 149
We have a 2017 CX-5 gets 27-30 MPG love the handling and overall car as a DD, 2000 F250 Superduty 19 MPG handles like crap tows anything forever at 12-15 MPG and the Elise I can't keep gas in lol All bases covered for whatever driving needed. I do miss my '99 Chrysler Town and Country 21-25 MPG fully loaded but stripped behind the front seats and I had a system of footlockers with all my gear plus table saw and compressor for any remodel project. HD helper springs helped it ride level even with 1200 lb load. Handled great even in the mountains and offroad towing a trailer in remote sites. Even towed a 35' cherry picker around one home while working on it.
Catsailr27 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  LotusTalk - The Lotus Cars Community > Community > Other Cars and Comparisons

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the LotusTalk - The Lotus Cars Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in











Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome