LotusTalk - The Lotus Cars Community - Reply to Topic
Thread: 2010 Exige S details (European) Reply to Thread
Title:
Message:
Trackback:
Send Trackbacks to (Separate multiple URLs with spaces) :
Post Icons
You may choose an icon for your message from the following list:
 

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the LotusTalk - The Lotus Cars Community forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in










  Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

  Topic Review (Newest First)
05-15-2009 08:45 PM
steuspeed A few mods and you got it.
05-15-2009 07:40 PM
Butters I'll say that I don't really like the splitter in the middle of the front intakes, but if Lotus say they are functional, then I suppose I'll take their word for it. Having said that, I like how Porche put signals in their "stabilizers".

Perhaps someone will mod some LED running lights into those? If they do, they will have stolen MY IDEA! Ha!
05-13-2009 06:27 AM
wallabyguy Very functional
05-13-2009 06:17 AM
MTribe Anyone know definitively how functional the wing is on the Exige?
05-13-2009 01:17 AM
njboy
Quote:
Originally Posted by MattG View Post
Yuck. The front reminds me of a Porsche. The new rear wing looks like something a high school kid would put on his Integra.
One could say the same thing for the original Exige wing. The debates about wings on performance cars will probably never end and unfortunately teenagers and 20 somethings have taken this functional item and turned it into the signature element of the "ricer".
05-12-2009 10:20 AM
Vishus_1 I said it before and I'll say it again...it is just awful. Seeing this really compelled me to go ahead and get a 2009 since I knew it would be last of the design I like.

If the other thread is correct that we will see a new Elise by 2011; why would Lotus mess this up and invest in the retooling for just two years?
05-12-2009 09:54 AM
Bane Front is a bit odd looking... the nose is too "stubby" to sport that look versus the longer Porsche slant in my opinion

TRD Celica wing =

They should have just gone all out and added an APR style functional wing.
05-12-2009 09:10 AM
wallabyguy
Quote:
Originally Posted by ACE51 View Post
i know this thread is dead but i've come back to beat the dead horse to put in my .02



that thing is hideous! what are they thinking? anyone have any interior shots?
The interior is, for the most part, the same with te exception of the wall inbetween the passanger cabin and the engine compartment.
05-12-2009 08:50 AM
ACE51 i know this thread is dead but i've come back to beat the dead horse to put in my .02



that thing is hideous! what are they thinking? anyone have any interior shots?
03-31-2009 02:16 PM
Me! Ick....I hate the new design. Unfortunately for Lotus, it seems I will have to buy a used exige someday (when I'm out of college) because the older ones are so much better looking. The rear wing looks so like something that belongs on a civic and the front looks too contrived.
03-31-2009 02:11 PM
ding I love exige GT3
03-30-2009 09:15 PM
MTribe Funny, I thought Porsche intake as soon as I saw it.

IMO, the front intakes no longer use the same design vocabulary as the rest of the car. The radiator exhaust on the top of the clam needs to be more angular.

For example: glance quickly back and forth at the front scoops and the radiator exhaust on the top of the front clam

The angle of the headlights, which was previously in harmony with the "smile" of the front intakes now looks to be at an odd angle.

I think it's really difficult to change elements of a well-styled car without changing the whole thing. Surprised they did that.
03-21-2009 03:47 PM
Thomasio



03-09-2009 06:40 PM
Hello Kitty
Ewww, It has the Celica wing

03-09-2009 06:20 PM
shay2nak I'm still glad I bought an 07.
03-09-2009 10:00 AM
rsch [QUOTE=Franzino;1233706]Ooo No... What a shame! I really don't like the 2010 Exige... When I saw The Exige (second generation) for the first time; it was love at first sight. That day I said “one day I will have one”. The 2010 model doesn’t do it for me! The biggest problem is the really ugly rear wing and the front is a problem also. It doesn't match the design of the car and doesn't look right at all. The Front has a little Porsche look and the rear wing to much aftermarket tuning look. Opening the trunk with that wing will be a fun adventure



+1 and performance figures are worse than a 220ps model
I'm really disappointed!
03-05-2009 08:58 AM
Allan Gibbs
Quote:
Originally Posted by JWA View Post
I always liked the "old" Exige rear spoiler.
The old Exige spoiler was really unique.
03-05-2009 07:43 AM
Vishus_1 I don't want to call it hideous since there is so much of the current model still unchanged in the 2010 design. But what has changed has botched the lines of the car and is not cohesive.

Some of Lotus's design changes recently have been peculiar. The Exige 260's odd stripes, the 2010 Exiges front end and tall spoiler on a car with the same width, the added spoiler on the Elise SC, the odd painted pieces on the California Elise. It is like they are intentionally corrupting the purity of the design for changes sake. Pretty bad execution.
03-05-2009 06:13 AM
JWA
Quote:
Originally Posted by LBC111 View Post
Why the [email protected]#k don't they use the GT3 design??? It's MUCH more refined and exotic looking.
I much prefer this new design over the GT3. The double spines over the vents on the GT3 were nice, but everything else about the front end looks off to me. This new design uses the elements of the GT3 design but in a much more cohesive grouping to my eye.

The rear spoiler is fine, and I'm sure that the super spoiler crowd will like it, though I always liked the "old" Exige rear spoiler.
03-05-2009 05:28 AM
xtn
Quote:
Originally Posted by charliex View Post
Yeah so he's not talking about the same bit as me then.
Sorry. You said "splitters" so I though you were talking about the bit we all usually refer to as a splitter.
This thread has more than 20 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome