|Topic Review (Newest First)|
|07-12-2019 06:49 AM|
|glagola1||We need to know your goals. If you just want "more" DF well, uh, I dunno. Just use what looks nice to you.|
|07-12-2019 06:41 AM|
Originally Posted by terryob View Post
Note that the wing here is turned way too steep, I was chasing a driver induced handling problem.
|07-12-2019 06:12 AM|
This is an old but good article I found from an engineering perspective comparing a stock Exige vs a race prepped Exige.
|07-12-2019 03:52 AM|
I did everything you could imagine on my track Exige S, in stages until I got the results I was looking for. Huge expense while I “toyed” with little enhancements that produced minimal results. If your going to do aero on your car that actually works you will need to committed and do it all at a big expense. And realize you will be slower in the straights but glued to the corners like nothing else on the track.
This is a slippery slope. Full aero requires the right suspension and larger brakes.
|07-12-2019 02:40 AM|
i know this is an old post, but does anyone have any real facts???
yes, racers copy other racers, but that does not always make it right/best/ideal
i'm investigating options for my 07 exige race car
|12-10-2018 03:57 PM|
Can we assume you are aiming for function over form? What application? Track, autoX?
Anything added will reduce top end. With these cars it’s getting front downforce that’s the challenge.
And you’re right, real data is hard to come by.
I think most of us just copy the looks of the real racers. I suspect the real racers copy the other real racers.
Never got around to the side skirts.
|12-10-2018 03:49 PM|
|4380r||I personally think most of the more extreme aero looks terrible on the Elige. Cannards, the big picnic table bench wings and cow catcher splitters really make these cars look too Hot Wheelish, almost cartoonish. If you need the aero for tracking, well then it's utility and the looks can be forgiven. Too much of the aero is like the 'carbon fiber.' Too boy-racerish.|
|12-10-2018 03:38 PM|
Originally Posted by Ls1Rx7 View Post
The side skirts I wasnt a good enough driver when I installed them so I am not 100% certain, but pictures and water marks from driving in the rain show they are keeping air under the car, so as long as the diffuser is working they have to be working...
For the wing as you are aware the cheaper wings arent that efficient, but they are a lot cheaper.
|12-10-2018 03:17 PM|
Aero That Works VS Looks Only
Lets hear it, I'm planning my bodywork for the Elise this winter and the big decision I need to make is if I want to stick with the Exige 2010 style wing (with a carbon fiber center section) or if I want to go with a more race oriented APR style wing.
It makes sense to fill the holes and do the body work now before the car's painted. Changing my mind later and then repainting the back and trying to match the paint would be a much more expensive proposition with the tri coat paint I'm planning.
Different wings produce tangible downforce though, and thats the only aero mod that I think we can all agree is effective if you're using a solid product. Even cheap APR wings create real downfoce too, just maybe more drag compared to better wings.
How about the front splitters, canards, wide side sills, diffusers available for this car? Those seem much more up for debate, and for good reason.
Concrete evidence is basically impossible to come by, because creating a true controlled back to back test just isn't possible for most hobbyists. But I'll take circumstantial evidence, and general input from those that have installed some of these parts.
If they're all pretty much for show, I'm ok with that.. it would be nice though if some of this stuff actually worked on the track too.