Joined
·
75 Posts
Larger thermal mass really doesn't have anything to do with it, if it's heat soaked. It just means you have a few seconds or minutes longer before soaking.Larger thermal mass is a huge part of the equation. Increased airflow is the other. Either alone will have some benefits, combined is shown to have the best results.
Increased airflow is the number one priority and given the limited options to work with inside the engine bay, unless you are moving the IC on to the top of your vehicle or using a Air/Water IC, a larger thermal mass isn't going to help in most situations. The only place it will help is on the ragged edge of heat soak where you'd have already heat soaked the stock IC but not the larger IC... and that window is pretty small and honestly if you're in the window, you're not being very efficient anyway.
A more important test for the RLS is how well air flows through it... how closely spaced are the fins and how good is the heat transfer from the fins to the tubing? If the fins are too tightly packed, you won't have optimal airflow, same goes for if they are too far apart. You could adjust the fins on a stock IC and probably get better performance from the same IC.
But again, it's all about the airflow at this point, given the constraints we are working in. If you maximize the airflow, then it's time to look at changing out the IC.