3 words for dealer "go f*ck yourself" which can possibly be preceded by "you're full of sh!t" if you so desire.majorbonr said:
No i didn't pay for PDI and no i would not. I'm sure Lotus would love to hear about that one...
3 words for dealer "go f*ck yourself" which can possibly be preceded by "you're full of sh!t" if you so desire.majorbonr said:i just got off the phone with my dealer and he told me i have a $300 charge for Pre-Delivery Inspection(PDI), anyone else get this charge? thanks.
scott
There's not much Lotus can do about this in America.offroadr35 said:3 words for dealer "go f*ck yourself" which can possibly be preceded by "you're full of sh!t" if you so desire.![]()
No i didn't pay for PDI and no i would not. I'm sure Lotus would love to hear about that one...
Lotus would tell you to "call your dealer." Seriously, where do you get the impression Lotus UK or Lotus USA actually cares what the dealership charges for cars they receive? I see no evidence of that AT ALL.offroadr35 said:3 words for dealer "go f*ck yourself" which can possibly be preceded by "you're full of sh!t" if you so desire.![]()
No i didn't pay for PDI and no i would not. I'm sure Lotus would love to hear about that one...
Ground Loop said:As for what is 'chargable' and what is not, there is No Such Rule about anything.
The Dealership can write in a "$1024 Save FireFly fee" and it would be your choice whether to pay it or walk away from the deal.
Nissan in San Diego just writes "+$500 Dealer Profit" on the sticker for hot cars. I kid you not.
+$300 PDI stands for "Because We Can"
The state govt, Lotus UK, and Lotus USA will nod in agreement.
The "S" in MSRP stands for Suggested. Furthermore, NO manfucturer can control the sale price. The best they can do to skirt the issue in the US is "MAP", where they withhold coadvertising dollars if the dealer advertises too low a price. Anything more can be construed as illegal price-fixing.agent.5 said:Time for a class action, using Lotus as the hub of conspiracy. It is about time to teach the auto industry a lesson and use Lotus as a case study.
Exactly.Ground Loop said:The "S" in MSRP stands for Suggested. Furthermore, NO manfucturer can control the sale price. The best they can do to skirt the issue in the US is "MAP", where they withhold coadvertising dollars if the dealer advertises too low a price. Anything more can be construed as illegal price-fixing.
It is entirely up to the dealership to set the sales price, and it's up to the buyers to protest by Not Buying.
While it would be great to see Lotus "punish" naughty dealerships that treat customers poorly, they will have to do it through things they can do legally, like smaller allocations in the future, or withholding marketing dollars. Remember, they're trying hard to get MORE dealerships, not piss off the ones that they currently have. I just wish they would do a better job in selecting them, especially here on the left coast.
Once again, all together now:Ground Loop said:Seriously, where do you get the impression Lotus UK or Lotus USA actually cares what the dealership charges for cars they receive? I see no evidence of that AT ALL.
Anyone wonder why it took a lot of people eight years to convince Lotus to risk it all and bring the Elise to the US?:wallbang: :wallbang: :shrug:agent.5 said:I don't need to like or dislike the law, I just need to find a jury of 12 to decide that the dealers and Lotus are the bad guys and that a judgment of $100M punitive damages will serve as a warning to all the bad guys out there, including but not limited to the bad guys from Britain, Japan, and United States.
Oh I understand perfectly.. my point was that Lotus, in addition to being powerless, also does not appear to care at all. The tone of their memos are that they want dealers to maximize profitability -- widely regarded as a good thing. Lotus also seems to reward errant behavior by giving "Extra cars", "Second Demos" and so on. They would not do this if they objected to the large markups. These (bonus cars) are things they control, and they chose to allocate them to dealers with shady business. That is their choice.TimMullen said:Once again, all together now:
Lotus UK and Lotus USA - by Federal law - cannot tell the dealers what to charge for anything beyond suggesting the MSRP. Period.
TimMullen said:Anyone wonder why it took a lot of people eight years to convince Lotus to risk it all and bring the Elise to the US?:wallbang: :wallbang: :shrug:
How about Saturn and Scion dealers? They absolutely do require their dealers to sell at MSRP (neither above nor below).Ground Loop said:The "S" in MSRP stands for Suggested. Furthermore, NO manfucturer can control the sale price. The best they can do to skirt the issue in the US is "MAP", where they withhold coadvertising dollars if the dealer advertises too low a price. Anything more can be construed as illegal price-fixing.
Lotus would have neverTimMullen said:Anyone wonder why it took a lot of people eight years to convince Lotus to risk it all and bring the Elise to the US?:wallbang: :wallbang: :shrug: