If you use the same procedure, the Evora should be better (i.e., no scraping). But the Evora also has bump guards that are "sacrificial".
1 - 8 of 8 Posts
In my time DDing both, I had to be more careful with the Elise as those two chins stuck out at a more precarious angle. The Evora approach angle isn't great, but much better than most expect due to the upward cant of the bottom side. As JLSELISE mentioned, further back (from memory roughly 12" back) from the actual lip there are two delrin-like pucks to protect.
This may lend SOME perspective...The boards were required, and it was very close (about 1/2" at one point, but remember my splitter juts out an additional 1.5-2") but it cleared just fine.
![]()
Without the splitter there would've been tons of clearance, but the boards were still required for a straight on approach. Daily, I just take things at an angle to be safe without much of a problem.
This may lend SOME perspective...The boards were required, and it was very close (about 1/2" at one point, but remember my splitter juts out an additional 1.5-2") but it cleared just fine.
Without the splitter there would've been tons of clearance, but the boards were still required for a straight on approach. Daily, I just take things at an angle to be safe without much of a problem.
My Evora isn't quite as bad as my last car, which routinely forced me to approach inclines/declines at a 45, sometimes prompting the unknowing car immediately behind to lay on the horn thinking I was some sort of crazed driver. 
1 - 8 of 8 Posts
