I didn't go the full 44%, I just went 40%. And set injectors back to 550cc scalar. Short test drive reveled that the engine is running much better.
Fastworks Level 2 User Help
Looking for Fuel > MAF Airflow table for 3" MAF.
Upgraded to lvl2 due to my engine is running lean with the provided base map and I have been able to remedy some of it previously by lowering the Injector Scale from 550 to 490.
I looked at the MAF Scaler and it matches what Phil says is the values for the stock intake system on one of his videos.
My initial thought is that this can be linearly increased by the percentage change of the area of the circle. In this case 2.5" to 3.0" is a 144% increase in surface area.
Below is a table of the MAF volts, the original value of the map and the modified 144%. Can someone with a 3" MAF validate this assumption?
Volts__Orig___144%
0.2_____0_____0
0.3_____4_____6
0.5_____14_____20
0.6_____36_____52
0.8_____73_____105
0.9_____129_____186
1.1_____210_____302
1.3_____320_____461
1.4_____464_____668
1.6_____646_____930
1.7_____873_____1257
1.9_____1149_____1655
2.0_____1479_____2130
2.2_____1869_____2691
2.3_____2323_____3345
2.5_____2848_____4101
2.7_____3448_____4965
2.8_____4130_____5947
3.0_____4898_____7053
3.1_____5758_____8292
3.3_____6716_____9671
3.4_____7778_____11200
3.6_____8949_____12887
3.8_____10235_____14738
3.9_____11642_____16764
4.1_____13175_____18972
4.2_____14841_____21371
4.4_____16646_____23970
4.5_____18594_____26775
4.7_____20693_____29798
4.8_____22949_____33047
5.0_____25366_____36527
Upgraded to lvl2 due to my engine is running lean with the provided base map and I have been able to remedy some of it previously by lowering the Injector Scale from 550 to 490.
I looked at the MAF Scaler and it matches what Phil says is the values for the stock intake system on one of his videos.
My initial thought is that this can be linearly increased by the percentage change of the area of the circle. In this case 2.5" to 3.0" is a 144% increase in surface area.
Below is a table of the MAF volts, the original value of the map and the modified 144%. Can someone with a 3" MAF validate this assumption?
Volts__Orig___144%
0.2_____0_____0
0.3_____4_____6
0.5_____14_____20
0.6_____36_____52
0.8_____73_____105
0.9_____129_____186
1.1_____210_____302
1.3_____320_____461
1.4_____464_____668
1.6_____646_____930
1.7_____873_____1257
1.9_____1149_____1655
2.0_____1479_____2130
2.2_____1869_____2691
2.3_____2323_____3345
2.5_____2848_____4101
2.7_____3448_____4965
2.8_____4130_____5947
3.0_____4898_____7053
3.1_____5758_____8292
3.3_____6716_____9671
3.4_____7778_____11200
3.6_____8949_____12887
3.8_____10235_____14738
3.9_____11642_____16764
4.1_____13175_____18972
4.2_____14841_____21371
4.4_____16646_____23970
4.5_____18594_____26775
4.7_____20693_____29798
4.8_____22949_____33047
5.0_____25366_____36527
1 - 4 of 4 Posts
Just a heads up the stock intake is more like 2.55-2.6", so your multiplier was a bit off, but yes you're essentially going about it correctly.
For viewers at home, the NA cars have a different MAF scale...
-PV
For viewers at home, the NA cars have a different MAF scale...
-PV
Out of curiosity why would the MAF scale on an N/A be adjusted as opposed to adjusting the Volumetric Efficiency table?
Or are you referring to N/A being ~2.5" and FI typically being ~3.0"?
Or are you referring to N/A being ~2.5" and FI typically being ~3.0"?
1 - 4 of 4 Posts
- This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
The Lotus Cars Community
A forum community dedicated to all Lotus owners and enthusiasts. Come join the discussion about performance, modifications, troubleshooting, maintenance, and more!
Full Forum Listing
Explore Our Forums
Recommended Communities
