Its got an Engine run time total of only 48hrs. So to have done 6000 miles in 48hrs youve averaged 125 mph.Is that based on the ECU dump? I don’t know anything about reading those outputs, but I would swear it looks as though it wasn’t tracked. Frankly, it is almost too “good” to be true.
Might have had a speedometer/odometer replacement.Its got an Engine run time total of only 48hrs. So to have done 6000 miles in 48hrs youve averaged 125 mph.
Which seems super high.
The other times and speeds are super low. Only spent 5 minutes above 150kmh. Which implies the above is optimistic.
ECU dump isnt that accurate though tight?
My ECU has been reset (soft reset) and flashed and I don't know if that affects the ECU dump. The ECU dump isn't very accurate from what I've read here on the forum, but it's hard to pick certain numbers that support an opinion and ignore others. Hope that makes sense.At such low running hours would it be more likely the ECU has been reset or replaced?
If its actually 48hrs run time thats only really like 2-3k miles
Or is an ECU dump just inaccurate?
may this helpHi everyone. This is my car. I purchased it off Lotus Talk 5 years ago from a member in South Carolina. He was an older gentleman who stated that he occasionally tracked the car. He had a lot of cars in his collection and was a true car enthusiast, so I had no reason to question the mileage. This was a bucket list car for me and I happily purchased the car. The car is very original and the speedometer/odometer has not been replaced. Yes, the car has some stone chips, otherwise, its condition is Nox Vidmate VLC consistent with a 6k mile car with little to no wear. It’s mechanically sound and the transmission shifts smoothly.
I’m happy to answer any questions here.