Since Scotty's original thread was closed and I can't ask, what is Jay Hass' law firm?
I did and am just waiting to hear back.Send a PM to ScottyB, he should have that info.
AFAIK, Scotty never posted the contact info for the law firm (not even the law firm's name); he was posting info about where Jay is currently working. I don't see a problem with the law firm's contact information being posted (though if we receive complaints from that firm about such information being posted we'll pull it from the site), but would ask Scotty to limit any post to just THAT information. I'm no lawyer, but I expect the first step in any legal proceeding is to contact the defendant or file suit naming that defendant, I don't think you can assume they're using any one law firm exclusively.
Very true, but this site has nothing to gain and everything to lose by getting involved in this. We're pushovers when it comes to legal matters.just because he complains does not mean that its illegal in any way.
Keep in mind that we are not discussing "illegal" actions here, but a law suit where two or more parties are claiming damages.just because he complains does not mean that its illegal in any way. I'd tend to believe that since he had his law firm contact ltalk to pull the first thread is justification for contacting said firm outright in future endevours. my humble, non-legal opinion of course
Anyone that needs the information that can easily get the info by simply PMing scotty.No, Hass' law firm contacted Ltalk to pull Scotty's new thread (as I understand it). I don't' think anyones suggesting ltalk take any part in it. However, as a major resource for the Lotus community I think that simply posting contact information to aid any other disgruntled client(s) is not unreasonable in the least. Then the attorneys can do their job, privately of course, and obviously not on here (public forum).