I'm biased (torque-biased?) in that I fitted a Quaife to my Exige. A few thoughts though:
1. racers prefer the clutch plate type - principally because:
(a) if you lift a wheel, the quaife loses all effect e.g. if you bump over a curb, or perhaps if the car rolls so much you lift a wheel as it bounces off the ground - this could easily happen with stock Lotus suspension, but then if you're fitting an LSD, you've surely already upgraded the suspension, right?
(b) the clutch type can also be tuned by altering how the clutch pack locks up under a variety of situations
2. the handling differences seem to be down to personal preference and arguable either way I would think - clutch type brings understeer on corner entry but allows more transition to power oversteer. How much of each factor depends on the clutch pack setup. Quaife type has no effect on corner entry and subtle oversteer on application of power - from my direct experience in the Exige.
3. clutch-type LSDs wear out, depending on the type and extent of track use this can happen in one season - racers regard this as "maintenance" whereas you might not be so crazy about transmission tear-downs every so often
For me, having experienced a clutch-type LSD wearing out in a 911 used as a track car, the clutch-type was a non-starter - I wanted an "install and forget" solution to my wheelspin woes in a car to be used primarily for non-competitive track use. I also wasn't interested in anything which added understeer on corner entry. But, as above, there are equally valid arguments the other way. You pay your money, you take your choice
Chris
P.S. my Quaife was installed by Auto Europe in Michigan, who are more than up to the task of the tear down and rebuild, are doing an increasing number of these, have the right tools etc. etc.