[Paul MD]

Folks

Can anyone categorically confirm or deny whether cat-back exhaust replacements such as the much vaunted Quicksilver invalidate US warranty?

In the UK it certainly didn't because the rear exhaust and stuff like brake pads/tyres are regarded as user replaceable parts subject to wear. This being the case manufacturers are required to allow the fitting of 3rd party components without warranty invalidation otherwise this would create a monopoly situation and be regarded as a restrictive business practice.

Now in the US.... I have no clue 'cos the law here is something of an ass...

Anyone actually KNOW? (Before I treat myself to a Quicksilver with my Xmas bonus)...

Also - why is Shinoo selling 'em cheap at the moment?

Paul

 

[Paul MD]

Thanks Stan - sensible words.

Seems the answer is as you describe but that if (say) the engine burns a valve or your cat croaks one is going to have one hell of a job getting Lotus to fix it under warranty if they think they can use the aftermarket part as an excuse... At the very least a protracted technical argument.

That said, a good dealer will probably just be economic with the truth as far as Lotus are concerned.

Go with a Lotus exhaust and one has considerably more leverage methinks ...in the unlikely event of a problem...

Paul