Sure, but my 2009 Subaru Legacy's 6spd didn't. With the gearing/torque it was also unnecessary to downshift into 1st, and so it was designed that way. You could drive away in 2nd at a <5mph roll no problem. I've tried it on my Evora several times, and it definitely feels like 1st gear doesn't have a synchro in, or if it does, it's very small/insufficient. Without rev matching at anything 5mph or up, it won't go down into 1st at any level of force I care to push on it with. 2nd is not like this in any way though, and is quite smooth from any gear.Not sure what cars you're referring to. My 1990 VW, 1993 Toyota 4Runner, 1994 Porsche 968 and my 2011 Lotus Elise all have synchros on first gear. So did my 1972 VW Bug, my 1985 Chevrolet Chevette and my 1977½ Porsche 924 and my . . . shall I go on? (Okay, not the Bug, but we had to go back 46 years to find something without a synchro on first. First and reverse were on the same shaft.) I drive in the mountains and routinely have to shift into first gear on the fly for some very steep grades. It's not a problem with rev-matching and I have yet to wear the first gear synchros out on any car I own or have ever owned (and first gear synchros are usually the first to go). Just for reference, I'm downshifting into first in my Porsche at about 15 mph on a hairpin turn. The Porsche has very tall gearing because it has lots of torque, but second is too tall for the ensuing hill.
Remember this is a 3.5L V6 with a close ratio box - going down into 1st just really isn't necessary, so no reason to fight to make it so. You can double clutch it fine to drop it down into 1st, but the results are likely not what you want if you do anyhow.
I do agree that problems getting into 2nd is not a good sign though.