The Lotus Cars Community banner
  • Hi there! Why not register as a user to enjoy all of the benefits of the site? You may register here. When you register, please pick a username that is non-commercial. If you use a name that appears on any search engine commercially, you must pick another name, whether it applies to you or not. Commercial usernames are for supporting vendor use only. If you want to become a supporting vendor and grow your business, please follow this link. Thanks!

Beating the sound restrictions in an Elise/exige

4.3K views 19 replies 11 participants last post by  AustinP  
#1 ·
So it's an ongoing battle with our little cars. They're small, but they're pretty loud... The short exhaust run, high redline, and our constant desire to shed weight don't help matters. Our tracks up here in the northeast are getting stricter as complaints from neighbors increase.

I've finally come to a compromised solution that I think I can use for awhile. So I wanted to share it in case anyone is having similar issues.

I have the DMC header and running a decat pipe. From my understanding we'd burn right through the cat with track usage...and my car is basically a track car at this point. I also was advised to keep my muffler a straight-thru muffler with my power levels being what they are. My solution is to use a BOE ST muffler on unrestricted or less restrictive tracks. And to piggyback a BOE QS muffler on the more restrictive days. This setup just helped me pass a track that supposedly measures at 92db from 50ft away. Whether or not I was actually that low, or if I just wasn't loud enough to grab their attention is yet to be determined.

The swap between the setup can be done in less than 10 minutes and without removing any other parts really. I did remove my license plate and the two little lights that shine on it. You basically remove the tip off the ST muffler. Install the new u-bend that has a donut gasket (this was important to allow the muffler to move as needed), install the QS muffler with a rigid connection (and it fits perfectly) and then add your tip back on the end of the QS.

See photos. I know others have done similar...I just really like how this turned out since I can do the swap so easily...and it still looks somewhat clean to me. I was even able to fit my license plate back on it. BOE fabbed up the u-bend and brackets for me.

1289720
1289721
1289722
1289723
1289724
1289725
1289726
 
#3 ·
That seems a pretty elegant solution.

Don't they make a phone app for SPL you could test it out on?
Yea there are. Although I'm sure there's so many factors that go into sound testing. One of them being how much dust and dirt build up I just have in my phone's mic haha.

Losing your day due to sound restrictions is just horrible though. Glad I have a fairly easy and quick solution now. Even further, I can eventually add a 90 or two and turn the pipe away from the corner workers that measure.
 
#4 ·
Looks fantastic. I'm wondering how much heat the second muffler will throw and if you'll have any discoloring issues on the clam. Also, if you'll melt your license plate lights (been there)

I'm looking for quieter, because of local tracks (Laguna) and I like my hearing.

Thanks in advance for the follow up.
 
#5 ·
Only one hpde event under my belt. (7) 20ish minute sessions. I had the same concerns as you about the heat. I preemptively removed my license plate lights.

I actually took a little bit off my decat pipe to get everything further to the left as my initial install was way too close to the rear clam. See photo below.

My biggest concern was the u bend. It gets extremely hot and it's not insulated. At least the muffler itself has 3 layers of fiberglass. I also preemptively brought some titanium heat wrap with me to wrap the u bend just in case. I monitored it and everything seemed ok. I was new to the track and new to the power levels of the car... So I wasn't necessarily going balls out for 20 minutes straight. Data showed a lot more coasting than I'd usually have. I also thought about wrapping the muffler itself. That of course would keep heat in and likely blow out the fiberglass packing a lot sooner than normal. Although fiberglass packing is a lot cheaper than a fiberglass clamshell.

1289741
1289742
 
#7 ·
@acslater - I believe you invented this (on the West Coast at least, haha) ...

I have done exactly what @acslater did:

ST + QS and bolt the QS to the diffuser with an OEM hanger setup (rubber isolators and all, although we use only one nut and and bolt and one isolator per side)

We did not use a donut and likely a larger radius u-bend (I do not think the exhaust moves much because the hanger is bolted to the subframe?)
 
#10 ·
Great topic!
I use a ST-5 with a small U bend tip, and that passes Laguna 90 db days. No cat, 2.5" header View attachment 1289751
In my experience, in an S220, running just a u-bend WITH a cat and stock header was hit or miss. ST-5 isn’t recommended for regular track use (per BOE) but is probably okay on an NA or OE supercharged Exige and might be enough to keep you under 90 more consistently… not sure how much variance you’ve seen in ambient conditions with your experience thus far
 
#17 ·
Does the stock exhaust meet sound regulations?
Maybe it could be re-plumbed to exit above the diffuser.
The weight of two canister style mufflers may weight more
than the OEM boat anchor. Also, the OEM does not have packing
material. It is a chambered design....
Before I went down the modification hole I thought the stock
exhaust wasn't bad. I swapped it primarily for weight savings.

The Sonic Fury from Inokinetic may meet sound regs alone.
It claims to not drone but it does however significantly less than
any exhaust I have ever used and I have been through many.
 
#18 ·
Does the stock exhaust meet sound regulations?
Maybe it could be re-plumbed to exit above the diffuser.
The weight of two canister style mufflers may weight more
than the OEM boat anchor. Also, the OEM does not have packing
material. It is a chambered design....
Before I went down the modification hole I thought the stock
exhaust wasn't bad. I swapped it primarily for weight savings.

The Sonic Fury from Inokinetic may meet sound regs alone.
It claims to not drone but it does however significantly less than
any exhaust I have ever used and I have been through many.
Yea the basic stock one would likely meet sound regulations. Not the stage 2 or others. I think the two mufflers are actually still lighter. The benefit of the two mufflers is the straight through design for higher horsepower setups. And the swap is really easy now. I can go to an unknown track with the single muffler and tack on the 2nd muffler if I get warned.

The drone is one thing. But the high pitch noise that comes out of the 2zz at near redline is what was triggering most of my issues with getting flagged at these events. With all that said, I don't particularly like the sound of these boe mufflers... But I don't really care for all that anymore.
 
#20 ·
Another data point, I have 2bular headers, mid-pipe with silencer, and 8x22 muffler, with stock intake (no "boot") and SC pulley (basically stock S240 power). This setup has been fine a number of days at Lime Rock, Tremblant, and Club Motorsports. I did get a warning once at Tremblant on an overcast day with a low ceiling, no black flag but they warned me on my way in that I was "marginal". They move their sound meter around which may also have been a factor. Sound-wise, the mid-pipe with silencer falls somewhere between a straight mid-pipe and a mid-pipe with high flow cat, I think it's a good option if you just want to have one setup.